Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Managing it all by numbers: A review of Johnson & Kaplan's `Relevance Lost'

Ezzamel, Mahmoud ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3673-8440, Hoskin, Keith and Macve, Richard 1990. Managing it all by numbers: A review of Johnson & Kaplan's `Relevance Lost'. Accounting and Business Research 20 (78) , pp. 153-166. 10.1080/00014788.1990.9728873

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This review article sets out the Johnson and Kaplan diagnosis of the ‘problem’ with modern US cost accounting and management control systems (‘MAS’) and challenges both their historical analysis and their proposed remedy. It traces the genesis of the knowledge-based disciplinary power of managerialism from the 1830s in the US and contrasts the development of the US/UK focus of MAS on ‘managing by the numbers’, with the different way that knowledge-power has been used by, and has interacted with, managerialism in Japan. It argues that the problems to be confronted with MAS are inherent in the historical genesis of such systems and that it is the behavioural limitations in the way organisations deploy MAS that most need attention. In addition the interrelationships of control between the accounting measurements that create visibility within and without the organisation require that greater attention be addressed to the technical limitations of financial accounting. In conclusion it is suggested that the differing alignments of knowledge-based expertise and disciplinary practices of management control that have developed in the US/UK and in Japan reflect deeper differences in their cultural history.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Business (Including Economics)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
ISSN: 0001-4788
Date of Acceptance: 1990
Last Modified: 28 Oct 2022 10:05
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/76648

Citation Data

Cited 128 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item