Catalyst and Catalysis for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis: A Comparative Analysis of Iron and Cobalt Catalysts on SBA-15

Volume 7 • Issue 2 • 1000172 J Thermodyn Catal ISSN: 2160-7544 JTC, an open access journal Catalyst and Catalysis for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis: A Comparative Analysis of Iron and Cobalt Catalysts on SBA-15 Mala A Sainna1* and Abba MK2 1Manchester Institute of Biotechnology and School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom 2Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University Bauchi, PMB 0248, Yelwa Road, Bauchi State, Nigeria


Introduction
The search for alternatives to non-renewable energy, such as crude oil and to provide a sulphur free fuel is becoming an interesting field of study to scientist and researchers all over the world. Hydrogenation of carbon monoxide (CO) with several catalysts such as, nickel, cobalt, and iron to produce mostly alkanes, alkenes and oxygen containing compounds as by-products is known as Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS). The mechanism for the reaction is predicted to follow a stepwise chain growth of hydrocarbons, according to Schulz-Flory Distribution [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Currently, the main commercial interest in Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) process is the production of high quality sulphur-free synthetic diesel fuels from natural gas. The formation of hydrogen and carbon monoxide (CO+H 2 ) commonly referred to as synthesis gas, involves several processes such as dry reforming of methane, partial oxidation of methane, steam reforming and water gas shift reaction. This process serves as routes to producing fuel precursors and chemicals used in refineries and petrochemical plants making the F-T process viable [9][10][11][12][13]. The renewed interest in F-T synthesis, is probably not because of the abundant natural gas in the globe, but because of the global demand for fuel supplies and environmental policies placed on the quality of fuel emitted to the environment. While the concept of hydrogen fuel and biomass remains an important option for fossils fuel, synthetic fuel produced by the F-T process is currently promoted as the fuel for the future. However, the maximum potential of the F-T process is yet to be achieved. This is because, the cost of running an F-T plant is expensive compared to the direct production of gasoline and diesel via crude oil. Consequently, research and huge investments in Europe, Asia, Africa and the U.S to improve the amount of C 2 -C 4 olefins is proliferated. The research is aimed at optimizing the selectivity of cracking high-boiling waxy hydrocarbons that can be converted through cracking processes to any desired hydrocarbon of any length [14][15][16][17][18]. The F-T reaction is highly exothermic and very slow. Catalyst is therefore required to increase the rate of reaction and reduce the energy consumed during the reaction. Gleaves et al. [19] used and modified several heterogeneous catalysts by promoting the catalyst with mostly metals from Group VIII. For example, coke deposition on Ru, Fe, Co, Rh, Pd, Pt, and Ir affects the mechanism [17][18][19]. Roa et al. [20] illustrated that the deposition of coke on metal surfaces are as a result of disproportionation of CO and cracking of hydrocarbons during the reaction. This can de-activate the catalyst and reduce product yield. Meanwhile, Basini et al. [21], tried to understand the mechanism of F-T reaction on different catalyst optimizing steam/carbon and oxygen/carbon as feed stock. They suggested that, majority of group VIII metals are catalytically active for the reaction, but their resistance to coke deposition on catalyst performance decreases across the periodic table. Whereas, noble metals, such as Pt, and Rh, have been reported to be more resistant to coke deposition and used as promoters [22], however, they are very expensive and not used on large scale, as compared to nickel, cobalt and iron which are widely used in large scale (Scheme 1).
In this report, we thoroughly investigated and rationalized the influence of Cobalt and iron loading, cobalt and iron precursor, and the effect of Mg and Mn promoters on the physico-chemical properties as well as the catalytic properties and structural appearance of mesoporous

Abstract
The influence of Cobalt and iron loading, cobalt and iron precursor, and the effect of promoters(Mg and Mn) on the physico-chemical properties as well as the catalytic properties and structural appearance of mesopourous Co/ SBA-15, Fe/SBA-15 and bimetallic Fe, Co/SBA-15 catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch (FTS) reaction is investigated. The various prepared catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron micropscope (SEM), Energy dispersion X-ray diffraction (EDX) and Temperature programmed reduction (TPR). For the Co/SBA-15 and Fe/SBA-15 prepared and promoted with Magnesium and manganese (Mg, Mn), the dispersion of the metal loaded (Fe, Co) increases significantly when compared to the un-promoted Co/SBA-15 and Fe/SBA-15, and the dispersion of metal loaded (Co, Fe) was found to be higher with Mg than Mn promoter. The bimetallic catalyst was also found to have a higher dispersion of the metals than a single metal loaded catalyst (Co/SBA-15, Fe/SBA-15). Promoting the catalyst with Mn increases dispersion but it was said to decrease reducibility leading to a catalyst that is less reactive than the un-promoted one [1][2][3]. The mesopourous catalyst prepared did not show any crystal growth in their meso-channels which propose the dispersion of the active metals on the mesopore and the formation of tiny crystals (nanocrystal) undetectable by the X-ray diffractogram. The absence of an intense peak of the crystals (Co 3 O 4 , Fe 3 O 4 ) at an expected angle might be due to the existence of ions of cobalt and iron which might be existing as a nanocluster or due to the disintegration of the mesopores structures.
Co/SBA-15, Fe/SBA-15 and bimetallic Fe, Co/SBA-15 catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS). The various catalyst prepared within this report is characterized using XRD, SEM, EDX, and TPR which is thoroughly discussed in the result section of the report.

Sol-Gel method
The mesoporous silica support (SiO 4 ) was prepared using procedure of Sol-Gel method as reported in previous work [22]. Reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial sources and purified by standard procedures before use.

SBA-15
The preparation of SBA-15 support is synthesised as follows: 8 grams of tri-block copolymer P123 (EO 20 PO 70 EO 20 also known as the poly (ethylene glycol)-poly (propylene glycol)-poly (ethylene-glycol)) is measured using an electronic weighing balance and dissolved in 240 grams of de-ionized (DI) water in a polyethylene bottle. The solution in the polyethylene bottle was placed in a glass bowl containing water and kept on a hot plate at 40°C for 6 hours under stirring at 545 rpm, until the whole solute P123 is completely dissolved, leading to a clear solution. 40 ml of 37% HCl is then slowly added using 50 ml measuring cylinder by dropping on the solution to reduce the pH of the solution. 10 munities later, 18.5 ml Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) is slowly dropped in (approximately 30 drop per minute) the mixture was kept for 24 hrs at 40°C under stirring condition for Hydrolysis and condensation reactions to complete. A white precipitated solution was formed which was then transferred into an oven at 95°C for 24 hours to age without stirring. The white solute precipitate was then filtered, washed sufficiently with approximately 600 ml of DI water to remove the template (P123) and afterwards the white solute powder was dried in an oven at 60°C for 24 hours using a glass watch vessel. The white powdered solute was removed from the oven and transferred into a crucible for calcinations under static condition for 6 hours at 550°C by setting the crucible to increase temperature to 5°C per minute and after heating for 6 hours it was cooled at 10°C per minute and finally the pure mesoporous silica was called the SBA-15 [21][22][23][24][25].

Metal loading by wet impregnation
Preparation of cobalt active catalyst by wet impregnation method: In wet impregnation, the cobalt loading on the channels of the mesoporous silica support is defined as the weight percentage of elemental Co in the catalysts. The equations below signifies the steps to follow in obtaining the percentage of the cobalt precursor used for the cobalt loading and the amount of the cobalt loaded in the channels of the SBA-15 silica support used; i.e.,

Molar weight of Cobalt weight of Cobalt nitrate weight of cobalt
Relative molecular weight of Cobalt nitrate To identify the weight of cobalt in a given weight of support, the weight of cobalt obtained using the equation above divided by the summation of the weight of a given support and the weight of cobalt obtained using eqn. (1) above, multiplied by 100 to obtain the percentage of the cobalt loaded in the channels of the given support. It is simplified as shown below;

%
Weight of cobalt weight of Cobalt in given weight of support Weight of support weight of cobalt The concentration of the precursor used in the DI water in which it is dissolved is denoted as the equation below; Where; The equation below is used to measure the concentration of the salt precursor used and the DI water or absolute alcohol;

Mol
Mass Concentration dm Molarmass The preparation of Co/SBA-15 by wet impregnation is conducted by the addition of 10 ml of absolute alcohol (ethanol) with 2 grams of Co(NO 3 ) 2 .6H 2 O in a round bottom flask with a short condenser at the top of the flask to condense the evaporated alcohol in the solution and the flask is kept in a bowl containing water, the mixture is stirred for at least 60 munities under 50°C on a hot plate to dissolve the salt precursor thoroughly (however the amount of the salt precursor was added according to the percentage of the metal required within the channels of the SBA-15 silica support), then 0.5 grams of the calcined mesoporous SBA-15 silica is added gently on the salt solution and allowed to stir for another 120 minutes at 50°C. The solution is left to cool till it is at room temperature then 10 ml of DI water is added to reduce the viscosity of the solution. The solution is then filtered and without washing the filtrate it is then dried in a vacuum oven for 60 minutes at a temperature of 120°C and a pressure of 800 psi. After drying, the sample is calcined at a temperature of 400°C for 4 hours by setting the crucible to a heating rate of 10°C per minutes and later cooled at 10°C per munities, to obtain the mechanical required structure of the catalyst. And finally the sample obtained is known as the Co/SBA-15 active catalyst.
Preparation of cobalt active catalyst with promoter using wet impregnation method: The preparation of active catalyst with promoter using wet impregnation method is conducted by the addition of 10 ml of absolute alcohol with 2 grams of the salt precursor together with 1 gram of Magnesium nitrate. Add both precursors in a round bottom flask containing 10 ml of absolute alcohol, stir for 1 hour at 50°C on a hot plate then add 0.5 grams of the calcined SBA-15 silica and allow to stir for another 2 hours, allow the solution to cool to room temperature then filter. Dry the filtrate in a vacuum heat for 1 hour at 12°C and calcine for 4 hours at 400°C with a heating rate of 10°C per minute followed by a cooling rate of 10°C per minute. The active catalyst obtained is expected to have a better dispersion as well as activity and selectivity due to the promoter within the channels of the mesoporous SBA-15 catalyst support. The amount of the metal deposited on the channels is measured by using X-ray diffractions (XRD) .

Preparation of bimetallic active catalyst by co-impregnation method:
The bimetallic active catalyst (Co-Fe/SiO 2 ) is prepared by the addition of 1.3 grams of cobalt nitrate hexahydrate, which is equivalent Scheme 1: The synthesis gas production is performed by different processes, this processes includes partial oxidation of methane (1), Dry reforming of methane (2), Water gas shift reaction (3) and Steam methane reforming (4)  to 35% theoretically, and 1.2 grams of iron (III) nitrate which is also equals to 36% and the two precursors are stirred to dissolved in absolute alcohol under 50°C for 1 hour followed by the addition of 0.5 grams of the calcined SBA-15 silica slowly in the homogeneous solution. The solution is allowed to stir at 50°C for 2 more hours which is then filtered and dried under 120°C for 1 hour in a vacuum oven. The dried sample is calcined for 4 hours at 400°C by the same heating and cooling rate as explained in the above procedure, and an orange powder is obtained.

Results and Discussion
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy results The energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) is an investigative method used in the chemical characterization or elemental analysis of the sample prepared. We utilized it to display the various samples of the catalyst prepared which were supported on silica SBA-15 were shown by elemental composition to note the amount of metal loaded (Fe, Co, Mg and Mn) after preparation of the samples using wet impregnation method. All the samples were prepared using DI water as a solvent instead of ethanol to dissolve the metal precursor and the concentration ranging from 0.46M to 0.49M. The samples characterized by means of EDX were recognized as x-SBA/15-n; where x refers to the percentage of the metal loaded in a sample, and the n is the various numbers of the samples prepared (Figures 1-7 and Tables 1-7).

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images evaluation
The scanning electron microscope is basically used to determine the samples composition, surface topology and some other properties like the electrical conductivity when electrons from the SEM interact with the atoms that unite to form the sample [52]. The Figures 8 and  9 below indicate the cobalt supported catalyst and iron supported        catalyst respectively after calcination; As can be observed from both images of the prepared catalyst at a magnification of 4.5 µm above, it can be seen that the catalysts were agglomerated and this is simply due to the fact that both catalyst lost the components of the precursors like the nitrates, water, the Tri-block copolymer used during preparation [poly (ethylene glycol)-poly (propylene glycol)-poly (ethylene-glycol)]. The absence of these residues of these components is as a result of the calcination of the prepared catalysts at 400°C as explained earlier.
Even though the image of Fe/SBA-15 shows some of the mesoporous structures where broken, it is obvious that the pores are not blocked by some surfactants to reduce the active metal dispersion on the support. Therefore, calcination of the catalyst before and after impregnation will increase surface area of the catalyst.

X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) spectroscopy result evaluation
X-ray diffraction spectroscopy pattern of an un-promoted as well as the magnesium and manganese promoted iron and cobalt catalysts prepared are calcined at 400°C together with those of the bulk Co 3 O 4 spinel's phase are presented below. All samples were prepared using cobalt nitrate and iron (III) nitrates precursors. It is apparent from the samples diffraction peaks, all cobalt catalysts showed reflection characteristics of the Co 3 O 4 spinel for the cobalt catalyst by observing an intense peak which is usually expected at 36.90°; the peak becomes narrower as the percentage of the cobalt increases indicating an increase of the mean Co 3 O 4 particles. Although the intensity of the peaks        ) on the surface of the SBA-15 silica rather than within the SBA-15 silica as desired. On the other hand, by promoting the Co/SBA-15 silica with Magnesium, it significantly increases the dispersion of the cobalt and the iron. Although, the increase in dispersion and the presence of Mn favors a strong interaction of the cobalt oxides with the support and possibly MnO phase can lead to a drastic catalyst deactivity of up to 50% as compared with the unpromoted one [53]. In the case of the iron catalyst, the wide angle shows a very sharp and unexpectedly long peak which is also an indication that some of the irons were dispersed on the surface of the SBA-15 silica support ( Figure 10).
The wide angle diffractogram above indicate the cobalt peak within the different mesoporous silica SBA-15 prepared and impregnated with different percentage of cobalt nitrate, the peaks of Co 3 O 4 crystals were obvious in each of the catalyst diffractogram which is at an angle of 36.5° as expected [52]. The peak for the catalyst with 15.60% Cobalt loading is higher among the rest with a lower cobalt loading; it is arranged according to (Series 4) 15.60% Co, (Series 3) 6.73% Co, (Series 2) 7.73% Co, (Series 1) 5.41 Co in a bimetallic catalyst. The catalyst with lower loading has less intense peak as compared to the catalyst with higher loading. According to Martinez et al. [52], the characteristics peak of Co 3 O 4 by the diffractogram is not very obvious at 36.5° at a lower Co loading. The mesoporous structures seems to be dependent on the quantity of the metal loading on the support has been observed after calculating the crystallite sizes of each of the samples prepared using shearers equation. The table below shows the average crystallite diameters of each of the sample prepared ( Table 8).
The table above indicates the metal loading expected theoretically, what was obtained after preparation and the crystallite size diameter of each of the samples prepared after calculating using the shearer's equation. The percentage of the reduced catalyst and the percentage of metal dispersion on the mesoporous SBA-15 silica support are also calculated using the interatomic distance equations [38][39][40]. As can be observed from the Table, the samples with higher metal loading has the larger particle size, this confirms the dependent of the metal loading on the particle size ( Figure 11).
The above diffractogram compares the different iron catalyst supported with SBA-15 silica with the iron loaded at different proportion. The Fe 2 O 3 peak is expected at an angle of 24.3°, 33.4°, and 35.6° as reported [53]. The diffractogram is arranged according to (Series 4) 29.19% Fe, (Series 3) 28.82% Fe, (Series 2) 33.48% Fe, and (Series 1) 14.37% Fe for the bimetallic loading. It is important to understand the fact that larger metal oxide crystallite diameter as compared to the pore diameter of the SBA-15 silica support will lead to the dispersion of the crystal on the surface of the SBA-15 silica and not within the meso-channels of the support. This can be identified by observing the XRD of the catalyst by having rough surface with unclear peaks as can be observed from the XRD patterns of "Series 4" above. For a very well dispersion of the metal on the support, three well resolved diffraction peaks of d 100 , d 110 , and d 200 associated with p6mm hexagonal symmetry can be obtained showing that the mesostructure was highly ordered. The crystallite size of the SBA-15 silica support is usually around 6-15 nm [31], however the diffractogram clearly showed the dispersion of the metals on the surface of the support which means that the average diameter of the crystal is larger than that of the support which leads to the dispersion of the metal on the surface. A very narrow and highly intense peak was also observed on the 29.19% Fe/SBA-15 silica which is also due to the dispersion of the metal on the surface of the support [54] (Figure 12). Figure 13 below shows the Temperature programmed reduction (TPR) peaks of cobalt oxides in an atmosphere of hydrogen which is recorded using the CATLAB-PCS (Micro-reactor with integrated mass spectrometer) [34] at 500°C (at an ascending heating rate of 15°C per minute). The first series (Series 2) on the graph for Hydrogen shows two peaks where the reduction of the cobalt oxide crystals occurred from Co 2 O 3 to CoO and the second peak is a reduction of CoO to Co-zero which is in the reduced state. This peaks were proven by the        peaks (Series 1) observed by formation of water at an align position to the peaks formed by hydrogen, the first reduction occurred at a temperature less than 350°C and the second reduction occurred at a temperature less than 450°C as can be observed from the graph above. The temperature programmed reduction techniques sometimes gives quantitative and qualitative picture of the catalyst surface reducibility as well as its sensitivity to promoters chemical changes or metal/ support interactions (Figure 13).

Conclusions
The seven different samples of Fischer Tropsch catalyst where prepared and the physico-chemical properties of their mesoporous SBA-15 supported format was investigated as a function of the metal loading, percentage dispersion of the metal on the support, effect of magnesium (Mg) and manganese (Mn) promoters, the average crystal diameter in each of the sample. Calcined samples of Co/SBA-15 prepared from Co (II) nitrate hexahydrate with cobalt loading of 15.60 wt% practically, another 6.73 wt% Co/SBA-15 promoted with Mg, 7.73 wt% Co/SBA-15 promoted with Mn where all characterized using XRD, EDX/SEM and TPR and it was concluded as follows; • The average crystal diameter is observed to be larger in iron catalyst and this could be due to the fact that Fe metal has higher percentage loading on the support than the cobalt; this indicates the dependence of metal loading on the average crystal diameter.
i.e., the higher the metal loading on the support, the larger the average crystal diameter.
• According to the observation on the wide angle pattern, it can be considered that the strong interaction of the support and the metal catalyst loaded can lead to high dispersion of the metal catalyst loaded within the meso-channels of the support, and this will lead to a weak peak on the wide angle diffractogram of the samples.
• The dispersion of the active metal sizes of Cobalt and iron samples increases with the addition of promoter, however it increases most with the magnesium promoter (Mg) which has the highest dispersion of 14.8 wt% on 6.73% Co/SBA-15, and 15.2 wt% on 28.82% Fe/SBA-15 as compared to manganese promoter with 12.2 wt% dispersion on 7.73% Co/SBA-15 and 9.6 wt% dispersion on 33.43% Fe/SBA-15. However, an increase in Mn promoter favors a strong interaction of the metal oxide with the support and perhaps with the MnO component generating a catalyst that maybe about 50% less active than the un-promoted catalyst sample [52].
• The dispersion was also observed to be high with the bimetallic 14.37% Fe-5.41% Co/SBA-15 catalyst with the active metal dispersion on the support of 15.7% was observed.
• It should be well-known that the absence of intense reflection at expected peaks by the wide angle XRD in an active metal catalyst suggest the formation of either small metal crystal particles that is undetectable by the X-ray diffractogram, or it means the disintegration of the mesoporous structure. Likewise for the small angle, the absence of the peaks at d 100 , d 110 and d 200 might be due to the collapse of the hexagonal structure of the support as observed from the XRD pattern of the small angles XRD result [52][53][54][55][56].