Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

'Who does this patient belong to?' boundary work and the re/making of (NSTEMI) heart attack patients

Cramer, Helen, Hughes, Jacki, Johnson, Rachel, Evans, Maggie, Deaton, Christi, Timmis, Adam, Hemingway, Harry, Feder, Gene and Featherstone, Katie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-8425 2018. 'Who does this patient belong to?' boundary work and the re/making of (NSTEMI) heart attack patients. Sociology of Health and Illness 40 (8) , pp. 1404-1429. 10.1111/1467-9566.12778

[thumbnail of Cramer_et_al-2018-Sociology_of_Health_%26_Illness (1).pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (295kB) | Preview

Abstract

This ethnography within ten English and Welsh hospitals explores the significance of boundary work and the impacts of this work on the quality of care experienced by heart attack patients who have suspected non‐ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) /non‐ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Beginning with the initial identification and prioritisation of patients, boundary work informed negotiations over responsibility for patients, their transfer and admission to different wards, and their access to specific domains in order to receive diagnostic tests and treatment. In order to navigate boundaries successfully and for their clinical needs to be more easily recognised by staff, a patient needed to become a stable boundary object. Ongoing uncertainty in fixing their clinical classification, was a key reason why many NSTEMI patients faltered as boundary objects. Viewing NSTEMI patients as boundary objects helps to articulate the critical and ongoing process of classification and categorisation in the creation and maintenance of boundary objects. We show the essential, but hidden, role of boundary actors in making and re‐making patients into boundary objects. Physical location was critical and the parallel processes of exclusion and restriction of boundary object status can lead to marginalisation of some patients and inequalities of care

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Centre for Trials Research (CNTRR)
Medicine
Healthcare Sciences
Additional Information: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence
Publisher: Wiley
ISSN: 0141-9889
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 18 July 2018
Date of Acceptance: 10 May 2018
Last Modified: 04 May 2023 23:10
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/113260

Citation Data

Cited 11 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics