Attitudes to Training and Their Relation to the Well-being of Workers

Background: This study aimed to investigate the influence of attitudes towards training on individuals’ level of well-being, after controlling for other variables (demographics and psychosocial


INTRODUCTION
Training is essential to develop individuals' expertise to meet current and future job demands and improve work performance [1].At the same time, individuals' well-being is crucial to ensure that they can fully and positively carry out their daily duties.In addition to studies that have examined what constitutes well-being and the factors behind it, many researchers have investigated the predictors of training effectiveness and transfer of training.However, there has been very little integration between them.This study is an attempt to bridge the gap between training effectiveness predictors and well-being.

Well-being
Well-being is often associated with the experience of pleasure and the absence of pain over time [2].However, Ryff and Singer [3] claimed that well-being is much more than that.Well-being comprises an individual's sense of self-acceptance, positive relationship with others, display of autonomous functioning, environmental mastery and having a purpose in life and optimal personal growth [3].
Research on well-being began decades ago, and many researchers have examined the antecedents of well-being, ranging from personal to work-related characteristics [4][5][6][7][8][9][10].Initially, many researchers found that certain types of personality traits played a role in determining individuals' level of well-being.Personality is defined as individual differences in general patterns of cognition, emotion and behaviour [11], and these patterns evolve from both biological and environmental factors [12].Examinations of the connection between personality and well-being have been conducted among various populations [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].Research has found that those who have high conscientiousness tend to have high life satisfaction [22][23][24], along with the personality traits of agreeableness [23,24] and extraversion [22,23].Meanwhile, those with high neuroticism may experience more anxiety and depression [23], and low psychological well-being [25,26].Liu, Li, Ling and Cai [27] added that individuals' inclination to encounter positive affect and their extraversion traits result in them forming optimistic expectancies, and therefore increase their level of well-being.
Apart from personality, coping strategies also play a role in predicting individuals' levels of wellbeing.Coping is defined as an individual's constant effort to manage specific internal or external demands that are perceived as surpassing that individual's resources [28].It was found that a more active and positive coping strategy, for example, problem-solving, seeking social support, using cognitive restructuring or taking positive and planned action, may help boost individuals' psychological well-being [29,30] and decrease depression [31].On the other hand, a more passive or negative coping strategy, such as problem avoidance, social withdrawal, self-criticism, emotional discharge or seeking alternative rewards, will lead to increased feelings of depression [31] and distress [32].It was revealed that when individuals experienced high stress, their mental health decreased.This was not the case with those who frequently applied positive coping methods, such as positive re-interpretation and humour, which help prevent poor mental health [33].
Apart from personal characteristics, work-related variables also play a role in determining individuals' levels of well-being.There is much evidence to support the relationship between commitment and well-being.Mowday, Steers and Porter [34] defined commitment as an individual's loyalty towards the organisation, consisting of an active relationship with the organisation, with individuals willing to give something for its sake.
Employees with high commitment to the organisation also reported having a good level of well-being [4,35].In addition, affective and continuance commitment, which are the dimensions of organisational commitment proposed by Meyer and Allen [36], could moderate the relationship between job-related anxiety and intention to leave an organisation [37].Glazer and Kruse [37] found that nurses experiencing a high level of affective and continuance commitment were less influenced by job-related anxiety in terms of intention to leave a hospital.This result may have been due to the effect of commitment, which provided a meaningful relationship with the organisation; hence, when employees' commitment was high, this commitment would make them accept the anxiety caused by work stressors and would reduce the justification for the intention to leave [37].
Another work-related variable that can influence well-being is organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB).Organ [38] defined OCB as 'individual behaviour that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognised by the formal reward system and that in the aggregate promotes effective functioning of the organisation' (p.4).He has proposed five taxonomies of OCB: 1) conscientiousness, for example, employees following the rules and attending meetings and/or social gatherings, 2) courtesy, for example employees who respect others by consulting with other people before taking any action, 3) altruism, reflecting helping behaviour, 4) sportsmanship, for example avoiding trivial matters such as gossiping and complaining about small matters, and 5) civic virtue, which represents always updating aspects which affect an organisation.Boyd and Nowell [39] revealed that OCB directed towards both the organisation and individuals is positively associated with individuals' levels of psychological well-being.However, Bolino, Turnley and Niehoff [40] have suggested that OCB may have a dark side, proposing that OCBs could derive from selfserving motives.For example, an employee might perform an OCB to impress their employer or management, or the employee might have more mundane motives, such as exhibiting OCB due to boredom with their own job/task or helping others because they want to cover their counterproductive work behaviour.Bolino and Turnley [41] found that one type of OCB action, termed individual initiative, consisting of behaviour such as coming to work early and staying late, working during vacation, rearranging personal plans because of work, and so on, was related to higher levels of role overload and job stress and to an increase in work-family conflict.Thus, as Bolino and colleagues [42] suggest, researchers should not only focus on the positive but also any potential negative consequences of OCB.
With regard to job characteristics, the motivational elements that effect and define the meaningfulness, responsibility, and knowledge relating to work activities that are experienced by the employee [43] were found to influence various well-being outcomes.Research has found that workers who possess high levels of job latitude or control and who receive better social support from co-workers and supervisors tend to experience a high level of job satisfaction [44-46] and low levels of anxiety and depression [47], while being associated with higher levels of personal accomplishment [46].On the other hand, employees with high perceptions of work demand also scored high in perceived stress at work [45,48], felt anxious and depressed [49] and tended to be faced with psychological disorders such as obsessive compulsive disorder, paranoid ideation and psychoticism.Not only that, they also have poorer general health [50], and were associated with higher levels of emotional exhaustion and somatic complaints [46].In addition, De Lange and colleagues [51] claimed that low job control and high demands are related to low affective wellbeing, and high strain.Workers may face work overload when they report having high demands put upon them and having low control.This could mean that workers lack the opportunity to decide how to deal optimally with the demands they face.These situations lead to psychological stress reactions and low affective well-being [

Attitudes toward Training and Wellbeing
In Cognitive dissonance starts with cognitive inconsistency or discrepancy, and then the feeling of dissonance begins, where an individual experiences uncomfortable negative affective states.An individual then feels motivated to reduce this dissonance, and tries to adjust their cognitions or behaviour to reduce their cognitive inconsistency [82].Furthermore, it was found that individuals who experience high cognitive dissonance reported feeling stressed, and having poorer physical and mental health [84].In addition, a positive relationship between cognitive dissonance and anxiety can also be found [85], where the presence of dissonance was considered to be associated with feelings of anxiety.Suinn [85] suggests that when individuals experience arousal from cognitive inconsistency, two types of motivation may occur: first, motivation may increase as a desire to reduce dissonance, as proposed by Festinger [86]; or second, motivation might increase by the desire to reduce anxiety.
The influence of motivation to learn [60,62] and learning [61,68,72] on well-being is established.However, the role of transfer intention and cognitive dissonance on well-being are still underexplored.Hence, this study examines the influence of motivation to learn and learning, along with transfer intention and cognitive dissonance on individual levels of well-being.Thus, this study was the first to investigate these four attitudes simultaneously and most importantly, within the context of training programs.The findings from this study will benefit both the training and well-being research fields, considering that training effectiveness predictors -called 'attitudes to training' in this study -might play an important role in determining one's level of well-being.
In addition, as mentioned above, even though the DRIVE model [52] is a comprehensive model that takes into account various work demands and resources, and the role of individual difference factors in determining the stress or well-being and health-related outcomes of the workers, more specific attitudes, especially attitudes to training, were not included.Building from this imperfection and the flexibility of the model, into which any organisational and personal variables could be entered, this current study applied the key elements of the model, particularly the job characteristics and individual differences, along with introducing the influence of attitudes to training on workers' wellbeing.
As shown in Fig. 1, it was predicted that workers with high motivation to learn the content of the training programs would perceive that their understanding of the knowledge and skills presented in the training programs was improved, and would exhibit high intention to implement the new knowledge and skills in the work setting, and would also experience positive well-being.Meanwhile, those who encountered cognitive inconsistency when applying the new knowledge and skills, would also experience negative well-being; however, examination of the association between attitudes to training and well-being need to be controlled for other variables, particularly demographics and various psychosocial characteristics.

Aim and objective
The main aim of this study was to investigate the role of attitudes toward training that consist of motivation to learn, learning, transfer intention and cognitive dissonance on individuals' level of well-being.Since well-being could be influenced by various factors, demographic variables and psychosocial characteristics were controlled.Hence, the main hypothesis was: H1: Training attitudes influence well-being after controlling for demographics and psychosocial characteristics.

Participants
The study was carried out with the approval of the Ethics Committee, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, and with the informed consent of the participants.

Materials
This as being helpful and courteous to, and a good sport with, other people in the workplace.Next, commitment to organisation assessed whether the participants had high job satisfaction, and whether they were motivated employees that did not wish to quit their job.Lastly, well-being items measured the participants' level of life satisfaction, happiness, stress, anxiety, and depression.All items had a response scale of 1 (Not at all) to 10 (Very much so).
Training attitudes consist of motivation to learn, learning, transfer intention and cognitive dissonance.All of the items for these variables used other researchers' work as a guideline and modified the statement in accordance with the research objectives and to ensure that it was more suitable for the sample.Motivation to learn has four items that originate from the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire [91].This construct assessed participant eagerness to learn the content of the training programs.The reliability of this construct was found to be 0.931.Meanwhile, learning and transfer intention have three and two items, respectively.For learning construct, it measured participant perception regarding their knowledge that was improved after attending the training, while the transfer intention construct assessed respondents' intention in implementing the new knowledge and skills into the work setting.These two variables were derived from Machin and Fogarty [92] work, as a guideline.The reliabilities of learning and transfer intention were 0.922 and 0.872, respectively.Finally, cognitive dissonance has two items that originated from a study by Levin,Harriott [93].This construct assessed participants' uncomfortable negative affective state whenever they used the newly acquired knowledge and skills, with the reliability for these items being determined to be 0.906.The response scale for all training attitudes items ranged from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 10 (Strongly agree).All of the training attitude constructs have a good divergent and convergent validity.When factor analysis was conducted for all four constructs, there was a two-factor solution with positive attitudes in the first factor (motivation to learn, learning and transfer intention) and negative attitudes in the second factor (cognitive dissonance).In addition, correlational analysis (Table 2) showed that all of the positive attitudes were highly correlated with each other, ranging from .796 to .893, while the negative attitudes had a weak, yet significant, correlation with the positive attitudes (r = .175).
The list of questions in the survey and frequencies (%) in response categories are shown in the Appendix (Table 1).

Data analysis
The data were analysed using IBM SPSS 20 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences).Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to study the relationship between psychosocial characteristics, training attitudes and well-being.In addition, to examine the influence of training attitudes on well-being after controlling for other variables (demographic and psychosocial characteristics), hierarchical regression was employed.

RESULTS
The aim of this study was to investigate the role of training attitudes on well-being, after controlling for other variables (demographics and psychosocial characteristics).Before presenting the results related to the main objective, as a summary, Table 1 reveals that almost all of the positive psychosocial characteristics show a significant positive relationship with motivation to learn, learning, transfer intention and positive well-being.All of them were greater or equal to r(208) = .27,p < .01,two-tailed.Meanwhile, all of the negative psychosocial characteristics show a statistically significant correlation with cognitive dissonance and negative well-being.The relationships are greater or equal to r(208) = .43,p < .01.
Table 2 also demonstrates that motivation to learn, learning and transfer intention were significantly correlated (moderate) with positive well-being and were greater or equal to r(208) = .35,p < .01,while cognitive dissonance positively associated (moderate) with negative well-being, r(208) = .48,p < .01.
Moving on to the main objective, Table 3 illustrates the hierarchical regression analysis where demographic variables (Model I) and psychosocial characteristics (Model II) were regarded as the control variables, positive and negative well-being as the dependent variables, and attitudes toward training (Model II) as the input.Regarding positive well-being as the dependent variable, Model 1, with age, gender and education as the predictors, explained 0.02% of the variance and was not significant (F(3, 205) = .868,p > .459).Model 2, in which seven psychosocial characteristics were added, explained significantly more variance (R² change = .527,F(7, 198) = 32.397,p < .000).The model explains 52% of the variance in positive wellbeing (Adjusted R² = .516).Model 3, in which four training attitudes were added, explained a slight increase of variance but this increase was not significant (R² change = .004,F(4, 194) = .432,p > .785).Model 3 explained 51% of the variance in positive well-being (Adjusted R² = .511)and was significant (F(14, 194) = 16.517,p < .000).The significant predictors in Model 3 were positive personality and commitment.
As a summary, after controlling for demographics and psychosocial characteristics, only cognitive dissonance predicts negative well-being, while motivation to learn, learning, and transfer intention did not predict either positive or negative well-being.

DISCUSSION
The main objective of this study was to examine the link between attitudes toward training on positive and negative well-being among workers after controlling for other variables.The control variables were age, gender, education and psychosocial characteristics.It was important to control these variables because well-being can be influenced by various factors.Hence, to investigate the impact of attitudes towards training on individuals' level of well-being, these other variables need to be controlled for.
It was determined that motivation to learn, learning and transfer intention were positively correlated with positive well-being, while cognitive dissonance was associated with negative well-being.These results suggest that workers that evaluate themselves as highly motivated to learn the content of the training programs understand such content better after attending them; they have high intention to implement the newly acquired knowledge and skills to the work setting; further, they also perceived themselves as happier, more satisfied in life and always in a positive mood.
The positive association between motivation to learn and well-being is consistent with the findings of Burton and colleagues [94], and Bailey and Phillips [65], who found that individuals with high intrinsic motivation were reported to have greater levels of well-being.According to the self-determination theory, individuals who possess high motivation, where they are curious to learn, as well as to explore new knowledge and skills, and who find the learning process a pleasant experience, have higher life satisfaction, are happier and have a greater sense of well-being [95].Not only that, learning can also help enhance individuals' levels of well-being due to feeling empowered and confident as a result of the newly acquired knowledge [96,97] The associations between training attitudes and positive well-being were however no longer significant when established predictors were controlled for.This result suggests that earlier results attributed to training attitudes may reflect other factors and that personality and commitment are stronger predictors than motivation to learn, learning and transfer intention.Some prior studies that have noted the importance of personality on one's level of wellbeing include Strickhouser, Zell and Krizan [99] and Howell and colleagues [100].The former authors found that all of the Big Five personality factors as a whole had a moderate to large effect on health and well-being, particularly with respect to health behaviour and mental health.Meanwhile in this study, those with a positive personality and who were characterised as having a high level of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness to experience, and low neuroticism, along with high self-esteem, self-efficacy and optimism, tended to have a high level of well-being.Some authors have speculated that when individuals' have high positive personality they will experience frequent positive emotions because this personality helps them to achieve their relatedness and personal competence needs [100].Meanwhile Lui et.al.
[16] suggest that being socialised with other people tends to shape their optimistic expectancies, and help in activating the application of approach-oriented coping behaviours, which in turn elevates their wellbeing level.In addition, due to having a positive personality, they were more socially connected to the society, which led them to be more satisfied with their life and therefore they were happier [19].
The current study also found that commitment is a strong predictor in determining individual level of well-being.This result suggests that those with high organisational commitment tend to experience more positive moods and are happier and highly satisfied with their life.This finding further supports the proposal of Meyer and Maltin [101], who gathered evidence regarding the importance of organisational commitment on employees' level of well-being.Affective commitment could predict general health [102], positive affect [103], physical well-being [104], life satisfaction [105] and many more factors.As suggested by Glazer and Kruse [37], a possible explanation for this phenomenon may be the buffering effects of commitment on stressorstrain relations.According to the authors, workers with high affective commitment to the organisation are less likely to experience stress in the workplace, or they are more likely to receive greater access to resources [37].Commitment seems to provide a meaningful relationship between employees and the organisation, hence employee might better accept the anxiety caused by workplace stressors.
Moving on to the result regarding the influence of cognitive dissonance in the context of training on well-being, it was found that cognitive dissonance predicts ones' level of negative wellbeing.This finding suggests that workers who experience cognitive inconsistency, which is characterised as feeling uncomfortable when using new knowledge or skills and feeling conflicted or confused regarding whether or not to use the newly acquired knowledge and skills in

Implications, limitations and future directions
This study has several implications, including contribution to the existing body of knowledge, and also in the creation of new knowledge, along with a more practical use.These findings will therefore be of practical use among training practitioners or to others who may find this relevant and beneficial to them.As an example, because it was found that cognitive dissonance could influence well-being; trainers could encouraged the trainees to be more confident in applying the new knowledge and skills into the work setting and convince them that such new knowledge and skills are better than their previous knowledge and skills before they attended training.This approach could not only increase the transferability of the training or allow training programs to be more successful, but may also be beneficial to trainees, where the enrichment of well-being could still be achieved, even though the programs were not aimed to increase their level of well-being.
This study does, however, have a number of limitations.First, its results cannot be generalised because participant selection was purposive and involved convenience sampling; it is not random and stratified and only focused on certain criteria, which were aimed at workers who have experience in attending training programs only.
Second, this study examined four attitudes in the context of broad training programs.The participants had undergone various types of programs or courses, such as those related to human resources; hence, a clear distinction cannot be made as to which of the courses actually helped improve students' well-being.Their attitudes toward certain programs or courses may differ and might also bring different influences to well-being levels.Lastly, the study used a cross-sectional method, hence no cause and effect relationships can be suggested between training attitudes and well-being.
There are a few improvements that could be made to this study.First, since the study examined attitudes to training in a broader context, future research could focus on more specific programs or courses and investigate whether the specific content of the programs or courses might produce different levels of attitudes, hence influencing to varying degrees individual well-being levels.
Second, a longitudinal approach, preferably with an intervention, could improve the study by not only examining well-being changes over time, but also determining the causal effect of the relationship between training attitudes and well-being.

CONCLUSION
Training is important for developing and enhancing one's expertise to meet current and future job demands and continue personal development.At the same time, well-being needs to remain positive and high to ensure that they can perform well in their job and become more productive, and to prevent any mental health issues.Results of this study have shown that positive training attitudes comprising motivation to learn, learning and transfer intention have a relationship with well-being.However, these associations were no longer significant when personality and commitment were controlled for.Meanwhile, cognitive dissonance, which is characterised as having uncomfortable feelings when using newly acquired knowledge and skills, predicts negative well-being among workers and this remained significant even when established predictors were controlled for.

Peer-review history:
The peer review history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/26681 51].Past research has found that well-being can be influenced by various factors, ranging from personal to work-related characteristics.As proposed by Mark and Smith [52] in the Demands, Resources, and Individual Effects (DRIVE) model, both psychosocial workplace stressors and individual difference factors are important in developing one's subjective experiences of stress or well-being, and result in possible health-related outcomes.This model provides a combination of elements from the Demand, Control and Support (DCS) model [53] and the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) model [54], but adds a more crucial element, which is the individual difference factors.The simple DRIVE model proposed that job characteristics, particularly work demands (job demands and extrinsic effort), and work resources (job control, social support and rewards), along with individual differences (coping style, attributional style, intrinsic effort, and demographics), influence various health outcomes, such as anxiety, depression, and job satisfaction.This comprehensive model also emphasises flexibility, whereby different organisational and personal variables can be inserted into the framework and tested, either as predictors or outcomes [52].
. The positive relationship between intention and well-being is also consistent with what has been proposed by Pasikowski, Sek, and Ziarko [79] and Shim, Serido, and Tang [98].Individuals who have high behavioural intention will experience positive well-being, as suggested by Shim, Serido, and Tang [98], whereby an individual can intentionally increase their level of happiness through intentional behaviour.
Cognitive dissonance is defined as being when a person holds two or more cognitions that are contradictory to each other, or dissonant, and results in an unpleasant state of emotion that can lead to cognition alteration[82].Weisweiler and colleagues [83] provided new insight and suggested that individuals fail to transfer their newly acquired knowledge and skills to the workplace because they might encounter cognitive inconsistency or cognitive dissonance.
the training field, researchers generally examine factors that contribute to the effectiveness of training programs, or what makes the transfer of the knowledge and skills from the training program to the work setting successful.These factors can range from training design, to learner characteristics and the work environment [55-59].For this study, the learner characteristics chosen were the motivation to learn, learning, transfer intention and cognitive dissonance.For the purpose of this study, these four variables are referred to as attitudes towards training.Very few studies have so far investigated the associations between these four training attitudes and well-being, particularly in specific contexts (e.g., those related to training).Furthermore, no research, as far as we know, has examined the four attitudes simultaneously.However, some researchers have studied the association between these attitudes on wellbeing separately; for example, the influence of motivation to learn on well-being[60]; and the association between learning and well-being[61].is consistent with Lyubomirsky, Sheldon [81], who demonstrated that certain types of intentional behaviour or activity could influence individuals' level of well-being, such as intention to exercise, eat healthy food or use better coping strategies.In summary, it was apparent

Table 1 . Survey questions and frequencies (%) in response categories Psychosocial characteristics To what extent does your job have negative characteristics (e.g. high demands; requires a lot of effort; little consultation on change; role conflict; issues with other members of staff)?
APPENDIX

am confused either to apply the newly learned techniques in training courses or techniques that I usually used before undertaking the training courses.
2018 Zaiedy Nor and Smith; This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0),which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ©