Status of insular features: the perpetuation of legal fiction

Lewis, Reece ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8076-3635 2017. Status of insular features: the perpetuation of legal fiction. Presented at: ABLOS 9th Conference: 'Pushing the limits of UNCLOS', Monaco, Monaco, 10-11 Oct 2017.

Preview

PDF - Presentation Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

A lot of ink has been spilled on how we are to determine the status of maritime features. No doubt, this will continue in the aftermath of the decision of the Arbitration Tribunal in the South China Sea case (The Republic of Philippines v The People’s Republic of China) (2016). Indeed, the extent to which this “clarifies” the distinction between fully entitled islands and other features not so entitled, is doubtful. This paper demonstrates that the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal confirmed that the determination of the status of certain maritime features can be an exercise in legal fiction. Firstly, the paper analyses the concept of a “legal fiction” and considers their distinguishing features. Second, it explains that the law pertaining to artificial islands and to the determination of the status of some maritime features utilises fiction. Specifically, the rule that islands are only of natural formation was interpreted by the Arbitral Tribunal as requiring the denial of reality. We are to maintain a discrepancy between the actual physical status of insular features and their legal status. The paper asks whether this fiction is something that UNCLOS should allow?

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Other)
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Unpublished
Schools:	Law
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Law of the sea; islands; artificial islands; South China Sea
Related URLs:	Organisation
Date of Acceptance:	10 October 2017
Last Modified:	07 Nov 2022 09:43
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/130063

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item