Caminada, Martin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7498-0238 2017. Argumentation semantics as formal discussion. Journal of Applied Logics 4 (8) , pp. 2457-2492. |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (461kB) | Preview |
Official URL: http://collegepublications.co.uk/contents/ifcolog0...
Abstract
In the current review paper, we provide an overview of how mainstream argumentation semantics can be interpreted in terms of structured discussion. The idea is that an argument is justified according to a particular argumentation semantics iff it is possible to win a discussion of a particular type. Hence, different argumentation semantics correspond to different types of discussion. Our aim is to provide an overview of what these discussions look like, and their formal correspondence to argumentation semantics.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Computer Science & Informatics |
Publisher: | College Publications |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 24 October 2017 |
Date of Acceptance: | 25 September 2017 |
Last Modified: | 05 May 2023 04:10 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/105832 |
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |