Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

The structure of a metaphysical interpretation of science of history

Guo, Yunlong 2018. The structure of a metaphysical interpretation of science of history. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University.
Item availability restricted.

[thumbnail of 2018YunlongGuoPhD.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (2MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of YunlongGuo.pdf] PDF - Supplemental Material
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (116kB)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to reconstruct a metaphysical interpretation of the philosophy of history with regard to the spirit of historical thinking. The spirit of historical thinking is to emphasize the relation between what happened in the past and historical thinking about the past in the present. However, current philosophies of history, which are largely epistemologically oriented, have not adequately explored this relation. In order to investigate the relation between past and present, I refer to an Aristotelian philosophy of practice and politics, and adapt it to the domain of the philosophy of history, and argue the case for a metaphysical science of history. A metaphysical science of history contains two primary parts. They are the part on physis and the part on technê/phronēsis. With regard to physis that metaphysically investigates the natural generating progress of entities, I argue that the existence of historical events can be understood as a natural developing progress in which the events are ordered in a chronological sequence. Such chronological sequence is essentially the physis of history in the metaphysical sense (I characterize it as ‘Ordnungszeit’). For the part on technê/phronēsis, I demonstrate that Aristotelian knowing is for itself an action of knowing, which is located beyond a given temporal position in the past to both the past and the thinking present, and indicates the fundamental Beingness of history (I characterize it as ‘Geschehenszeit’). Finally I conclude that the historical eudaimonia, namely the pursuing of the completeness of historical knowledge, is the final presentation of actualizing Geschehenszeit, as it bridges the past and the present in accordance to the spirit of historical thinking.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Date Type: Completion
Status: Unpublished
Schools: Department of Politics and International Relations (POLIR)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
J Political Science > JC Political theory
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 15 October 2018
Last Modified: 30 Mar 2021 09:45
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/115891

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics