Brewka, Gerhard, Polberg, Sylwia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0811-0226 and Woltran, Stefan 2014. Generalizations of dung frameworks and their role in formal argumentation. IEEE Intelligent Systems 29 (1) , pp. 30-38. 10.1109/MIS.2013.122 |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (253kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article provides a short survey of some of the most popular abstract argumentation frameworks available today. The authors present the general idea of abstract argumentation, highlighting the role of abstract frameworks in the argumentation process, and review the original Dung frameworks and their semantics. A discussion of generalizations of these frameworks follows, focusing on structures taking preferences and values into account and approaches in which not only attack but also support relations can be modeled. Finally, the authors review the concept of abstract dialectical frameworks, one of the most general systems for abstract argumentation providing a flexible, principled representation of arbitrary argument relations.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Computer Science & Informatics |
Publisher: | IEEE |
ISSN: | 15411672 |
Funders: | DFG, FWF, Vienna PhD School of Informatics |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 15 March 2019 |
Date of Acceptance: | 5 November 2013 |
Last Modified: | 02 Dec 2024 18:45 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/120624 |
Citation Data
Cited 42 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |