Hadoux, Emmanuel, Hunter, Anthony and Polberg, Sylwia  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0811-0226
2018.
Biparty decision theory for dialogical argumentation.
Presented at: 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument,
Warsaw, Poland,
12th-14 September 2018.
Published in: Modgil, Sanjay and Budzynska, Katarzyna eds.
Computational Models of Argument.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
, vol.305
IOS,
pp. 233-240.
10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-233
|
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (210kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Proposals for strategies for dialogical argumentation often focus on situations where one of the agents wins the dialogue and the other agent loses. Yet in real-world argumentation, it is common for agents to not involve such zero-sum situations. Rather, the agents may enter into a dialogue with divergent but not necessarily opposing views on what is important in the outcomes from the argumentation. In order to model this kind of situation, we investigate a decision-theoretic approach that allows different participants to have different utility evaluations of a dialogue, and for the proponent to model the opponent's utility evaluation in order to optimize the choice of move in the dialogue.
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Schools: | Schools > Computer Science & Informatics |
| Publisher: | IOS |
| ISBN: | 978-1-61499-905-8 |
| Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 1 April 2019 |
| Date of Acceptance: | 25 June 2018 |
| Last Modified: | 25 Oct 2022 13:58 |
| URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/121307 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
 |
Edit Item |
Dimensions
Dimensions