Implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation

Sanders, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5712-9989, Channon, Sue ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5394-1483, Gobat, Nina ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1558-557X, Bennert, Kristina, Addison, Katy and Robling, Mike ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1004-036X 2019. Implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation. BMC Nursing 18 (1) , 13. 10.1186/s12912-019-0338-y

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (409kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background The Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) programme was introduced to support young first-time mothers. A randomised trial found FNP added little short-term benefit compared to usual care. The study included a comprehensive parallel process evaluation, including focus groups, conducted to aid understanding of the introduction of the programme into a new service and social context. The aim of the focus groups was to investigate views of key health professionals towards the integration and delivery of FNP programme in England. Methods Focus groups were conducted separately with Family Nurses, Health Visitors and Midwives at trial sites during 2011–2012. Transcripts from audio-recordings were analysed thematically. Results A total of 122 professionals participated in one of 19 focus groups. Family Nurses were confident in the effectiveness of FNP, although they experienced practical difficulties meeting programme fidelity targets and considered that programme goals did not sufficiently reflect client or community priorities. Health Visitors and Midwives regarded FNP as well-resourced and beneficial to clients, describing their own services as undervalued and struggling. They wished to work closely with Family Nurses, but felt excluded from doing so by practical barriers and programme protection. Conclusion FNP was described as well-resourced and delivered by highly motivated and well supported Family Nurses. FNP eligibility, content and outcomes conflicted with individual client and community priorities. These factors may have restricted the potential effectiveness of a programme developed and previously tested in a different social milieu. Building Blocks ISRCTN23019866 Registered 20/04/2009.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Centre for Trials Research (CNTRR) Healthcare Sciences Medicine
Publisher:	BioMed Central
ISSN:	1472-6955
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	16 April 2019
Date of Acceptance:	19 March 2019
Last Modified:	16 May 2023 20:54
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/121809

Citation Data

Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item