Newton, Scott 2009. The two sterling crises of 1964 and the decision not to devalue. Economic History Review 62 (1) , pp. 73-98. 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2007.00431.x |
Abstract
Conventional wisdom is critical of the newly elected Labour government's reaction to external financial difficulties in the autumn of 1964. Anxious about its political position, it avoided the necessary measures, involving stringent deflation and possibly devaluation. This article seeks to revise the traditional view by re-examining the response to what were actually two sterling crises. The first was handled efficiently. The second was provoked by speculation stemming from market expectations of devaluation. The decision not to devalue but seek external support was justifiable, given changes within the international economy which were to create problems for many postwar nation states.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | History, Archaeology and Religion |
Subjects: | D History General and Old World > D History (General) > D839 Post-war History, 1945 on H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance |
Publisher: | John Wiley & Sons |
ISSN: | 0013-0117 |
Last Modified: | 04 Jun 2017 02:54 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/13694 |
Citation Data
Cited 18 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |