Straw-men and selective citation are needed to argue that associative-link formation makes no contribution to human learning

Dwyer, Dominic M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8069-5508, Le Pelley, Michael Edward, George, David Noel, Haselgrove, Mark ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-1181 and Honey, Robert Colin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6870-1880 2009. Straw-men and selective citation are needed to argue that associative-link formation makes no contribution to human learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (02) , pp. 206-207. 10.1017/S0140525X09000946

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Mitchell et al. contend that there is no need to posit a contribution based on the formation of associative links to human learning. In order to sustain this argument, they have ignored evidence which is difficult to explain with propositional accounts; and they have mischaracterised the evidence they do cite by neglecting features of these experiments that contradict a propositional account.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Additional Information:	Open Peer Commentary on: Chris J. Mitchell, Jan De Houwer and Peter F. Lovibond (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32 , pp 183-198 doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000855. Pdf uploaded in accordance with publisher's policy at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0140-525X/ (accessed 21/02/2014).
Publisher:	Cambridge University Press
ISSN:	0140-525X
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	30 March 2016
Last Modified:	03 May 2023 05:52
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/13859

Citation Data

Cited 2 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item