Brown, Rachel ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4475-1733, Van Godwin, Jordan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5288-6614, Page, Nick ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4671-2797, Bauld, Linda, McKell, Jennifer, Hallingberg, Britt ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8016-5793, Maynar, Olivia, Blackwell, Anna and Moore, Graham ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-3978 2021. Implementation of e-cigarette regulation through the EU Tobacco Products Directive (2016) in Wales, Scotland and England from the perspectives of stakeholders involved in policy introduction and enforcement. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation 7 , 36. 10.18332/tpc/134370 |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (129kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Introduction: From May 2016, the European Union introduced the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) regulations, which included restrictions to advertising and new safety and labeling standards for e-cigarette products. This represented the first supranational policy regulating e-cigarette sales and marketing. This study explores perceptions of TPD and its implementation in Wales, Scotland and England, from perspectives of stakeholders involved in tobacco and e-cigarette policy and implementation in each nation. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were completed with 12 stakeholders from government and third sector organizations in the UK involved in tobacco control policy-making processes, and Trading Standards Officers from 13 UK local authorities. Data were analyzed thematically and a sub-sample double-coded. Results: Stakeholders held varying views of e-cigarettes, recognizing potential benefits and harms of both the products and the new policy actions. Nevertheless, most perceived TPD to be a positive step in introducing regulation for e-cigarettes. Compliance was perceived as high across nations, although stakeholders highlighted product adaptations to circumvent restrictions, and absence of controls on non-nicotine products. Budgetary and staffing limitations also meant that capacity to communicate new measures, and enforce change, was limited. This led to a gap occupied by industry representatives, who played a substantial role in preparing retailers for adoption of new measures. Conclusions: TPD policy roll-out was largely perceived positively and as having been effectively implemented. However, contribution of industry to communication of new measures and absence of resourcing for effective communication perhaps introduced widespread innovations within regulations. While largely viewed positively, some refinements to device regulations were proposed.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer) |
Publisher: | European Publishing |
ISSN: | 2459-3087 |
Funders: | MRC |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 19 March 2021 |
Date of Acceptance: | 15 March 2021 |
Last Modified: | 08 Jul 2023 19:27 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/139954 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |