PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study

Gwilym, Brenig, Waldron, Cherry-Ann ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8465-2492, Thomas-Jones, Emma ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7716-2786, Pallmann, Philip ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-9696, Preece, Ryan, Brookes-Howell, Lucy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8263-7130, Milosevic, Sarah ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1973-8286, Edwards, Adrian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6228-4446, Twine, Christopher ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0385-5760, Massey, I., Burton, J., Harris, Debbie, Samuel, K., Dilaver, N., Day, S. and Bosanquet, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2304-0489 2021. PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study. Presented at: National Research Collaborative Meeting 2020 (NRCM 2020), Virtual, 19 November - 10 December 2020. BJS Open. , vol.5 (Supple) Wiley, 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.089

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (59kB) | Preview

Abstract

Major Lower Limb Amputation (MLLA) is a life changing event with significant morbidity and mortality. Inaccurate risk prediction can lead to poor decision making, resulting in delay to definitive surgery, or undertaking amputation when not in the patient’s best interest. We aim to answer: In adult patients undergoing MLLA for chronic limb threatening ischaemia or diabetes, how accurately do health care professionals prospectively predict outcomes after MLLA, and how does this compare to existing prediction tools? Methods A multicentre prospective observational cohort study is being delivered through the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network. Dissemination was via an existing network of contacts and social media. Consecutive data will be collected for seven months from site launch date, including demographic data and pre-operative outcome predictions from surgeons, anaesthetists, and allied healthcare professionals. Follow-up data will comprise 30-day (mortality, morbidity, MLLA revision, surgical site infection, and blood transfusion) and 1-year (mortality, MLLA revision and ambulation). The accuracy of surgeons’ predictions will be evaluated and compared to pre-existing risk prediction scoring tools. Results PERCEIVE launched on 01/10/2020 with 23 centres (16 UK, 7 international) registered to collect data. 50 other centres (27 UK, 23 international) have expressed interest/are pursuing local audit/ethical approval. We aim to collect data on clinicians estimate of outcomes for over 500 patients. Discussion This study will utilise a trainee research network to provide data on the accuracy of healthcare professionals’ predictions of outcomes following MLLA and compare this to the utility of existing prediction tools in this patient cohort.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine Centre for Trials Research (CNTRR)
Publisher:	Wiley
ISSN:	2474-9842
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	22 April 2021
Last Modified:	08 Nov 2024 14:45
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/140473

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item