| Cushion, Stephen  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7164-8283, Morani, Marina  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-843X, Kyriakidou, Maria  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-5961 and Soo, Nikki  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8717-4323
      2022.
      
      Why media systems matter: A fact-checking study of UK television news during the Coronavirus pandemic.
      Digital Journalism
      10
      
        (5)
      
      , pp. 698-716.
      
      10.1080/21670811.2021.1965490   | 
| ![21670811.2021.pdf [thumbnail of 21670811.2021.pdf]](https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) | PDF
 - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | 
Abstract
Academic attention towards the effectiveness of fact-checking often centres on how receptive people are to the correction of news. But many studies do not take into account audience expectations of fact-checking or their engagement with news generally in the context of a national media system or its political culture. Our study makes an intervention into debates about fact-checking by focussing on the effectiveness this type of journalism has with audiences who were attentive to the news in the UK’s media system during a key point in a major health crisis. Drawing on a six-week news diary study (N = 200) during the coronavirus pandemic, our study concluded that the UK’s impartial media ecology and public service ethos creates an environment where audiences are largely receptive to journalists’ fact-checking and countering misinformation. Yet our content analysis of television news (N = 1259) during the pandemic found most broadcasters did not regularly challenge or question the government’s decision-making. We argue that since audiences favoured robust forms of journalistic scrutiny, broadcasters could more prominently fact-check claims and question dubious statements without undermining trust in journalism. We recommend scholars should pay more attention to understanding the audience reception of fact-checking across different media and political systems.
| Item Type: | Article | 
|---|---|
| Date Type: | Publication | 
| Status: | Published | 
| Schools: | Schools > Journalism, Media and Culture | 
| Additional Information: | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | 
| Publisher: | Routledge | 
| ISSN: | 2167-0811 | 
| Funders: | AHRC | 
| Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 22 September 2021 | 
| Last Modified: | 08 May 2023 07:37 | 
| URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/144321 | 
Citation Data
Cited 3 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
|  | Edit Item | 

 
							

 Altmetric
 Altmetric Altmetric
 Altmetric