Abbott, Owen ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (336kB) |
Abstract
This paper provides a critical comparison of two leading exponents of the relationship between morality and selfhood: Charles Taylor and George Herbert Mead. Specifically, it seeks to provide an assessment of the contribution each approach is able to make to a social theory of morality that has the self at its heart. Ultimately, it is argued that Taylor's phenomenological account neglects the significance of interaction and social relations in his conceptualisation of the relationship between morality and self, which undermines the capacity of his framework to explain how moral understandings and dialogic moral subjectivity develop in a world of shared meaning. I then argue that Mead's pragmatist interactionist approach overcomes many of the flaws in Taylor's framework, and offers a grounded conceptualisation of the relationship between self and morality that is able to provide a basis for a properly social account of moral subjectivity.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Additional Information: | This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Publisher: | Wiley |
ISSN: | 0021-8308 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 14 February 2022 |
Last Modified: | 16 May 2023 15:25 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/147333 |
Citation Data
Cited 4 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By ScopusĀ® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |