Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

The identification and management of people with an at‐risk mental state ( ARMS ) for psychosis in primary and secondary care services: a qualitative interview study

Strelchuk, Daniela, Wiles, Nicola, Derrick, Catherine, Zammit, Stan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2647-9211 and Turner, Katrina 2023. The identification and management of people with an at‐risk mental state ( ARMS ) for psychosis in primary and secondary care services: a qualitative interview study. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 17 (11) , pp. 1116-1124. 10.1111/eip.13412

[thumbnail of eip.13412.pdf] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (959kB)

Abstract

Aims: Early intervention in people with an at‐risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis can prevent the onset of psychosis. Clinical guidelines recommend that ARMS are referred to triage services, and then to Early Intervention (EI) teams in secondary care for assessment and treatment. However, little is known about how ARMS patients are identified and managed in UK primary and secondary care. This study explored patients' and clinicians' views of ARMS patients' care pathways. Methods: Eleven patients, 20 GPs, 11 clinicians from the triaging Primary Care Liaison Services (PCLS) and 10 EI clinicians were interviewed. Data were analysed thematically. Results: Most patients said their symptoms started in adolescence with depression and anxiety. Before being referred to EI teams, most patients were referred by their GP to well‐being services for talking therapies, which they had not found helpful. Some GPs said secondary care‘s high acceptance thresholds and scarce treatment availability made them reluctant to refer to EI teams. Triage in PCLS was influenced by patients’ risk of self‐harm, and formulation of psychotic symptoms; only those without clear evidence of other pathology and not at high risk of self‐harm were referred to EI teams, the others being referred to Recovery/Crisis services. Although patients referred to EI teams were offered an assessment, only some EI teams were commissioned to treat ARMS. Conclusions: Individuals meeting ARMS criteria might not receive early intervention due to high treatment thresholds and limited treatment availability in secondary care, suggesting clinical guidelines are not being met for this patient group.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics (CNGG)
Medicine
Additional Information: License information from Publisher: LICENSE 1: URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher: Wiley
ISSN: 1751-7885
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 13 April 2023
Date of Acceptance: 28 March 2023
Last Modified: 18 Dec 2023 14:08
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/158852

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics