Carr, Helen, Cowan, Dave ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (207kB) |
Abstract
This paper draws on historical institutionalism to consider the impact of housing-policy responses following the Grenfell fire on the marginalisation of the social-housing resident. We consider three specific policy responses: reform focused on conditions of rented properties; the social-housing White Paper; and building regulation and building-safety reforms. We suggest that, in historical institutionalist terms, each is part of a matrix of reform in which understandings of the social-housing resident play a critical role. We argue that rather than the fire provoking a paradigm shift in the recognition that government accords to the ignored and stigmatised citizens who live in social housing, the policy initiatives to date indicate a much more limited adjustment of policy within a normal frame. We suggest that this is because housing policy is dominated by a consumerist ideology that is self-reinforcing and ignores the social, economic and political complexity of tenure.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Cardiff Law & Politics |
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
ISSN: | 1744-5523 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 10 May 2023 |
Last Modified: | 11 May 2023 06:50 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/159264 |
Citation Data
Cited 4 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |