District judges and possession proceedings

Cowan, Dave ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9750-8262, Blandy, Sarah, Hitchings, Emma, Hunter, Caroline and Nixon, Judy 2006. District judges and possession proceedings. Journal of Law and Society 33 (4) , pp. 547-571. 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00370.x

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

In this article, we draw on data obtained in interviews with District Judges about the factors which they say influence the exercise of their discretion in possession proceedings. Analysing the data set enabled us to create three ideal types of judicial decision—making which we have labelled ‘liberal’, ‘patrician’, and formalist'. We discuss the differences between each ideal type across five different variables: the District Judge role; approach; view of occupiers; the problem; behaviour of occupiers. Our data demonstrate a set of reasons to explain different approaches and outcomes between different District Judges (as well as the perhaps unlikely identification of a ‘maverick’ or ‘idiosyncratic’ style of judging). We conclude by suggesting on the basis of our data that, despite calls to structure or remove the discretion from District Judges, any such changes are unlikely to have much effect

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Cardiff Law & Politics
Publisher:	Wiley
ISSN:	0263-323X
Last Modified:	31 May 2023 09:32
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/159274

Citation Data

Cited 27 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item