Tanesini, Alessandra ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (331kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In the article I argue that intellectual arrogance can be an individual, collective and even corporate vice. I show that arrogance is in all these cases underpinned by defensive positive evaluations of epistemic features of the evaluator in the service of buttressing its illegitimate social dominance. Individual arrogance as superbia or as hubris stems from attitudes biased by the motive of self-enhancement. Collective arrogance is underpinned by positive defensive attitudes to a one’s social identity that seeks to maintain its unwarranted social dominance. Finally, corporations are arrogant when their attitudes are the aggregation of the arrogant dispositions of its managers or when these corporations have inherited structures and policies that are defensive of its illegitimately dominant social status.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | English, Communication and Philosophy |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Publisher: | Springer |
ISSN: | 0039-7857 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 31 May 2023 |
Date of Acceptance: | 6 June 2023 |
Last Modified: | 12 Jul 2023 17:38 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/160081 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |