Pass or play: Should regulators address the money laundering risks posed by cryptocurrencies themselves or await legislative reform?

Hillman, Henry 2024. Pass or play: Should regulators address the money laundering risks posed by cryptocurrencies themselves or await legislative reform? Journal of Business Law 4 , pp. 301-328. Item availability restricted.

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 14 June 2025 due to copyright restrictions. Download (624kB)

Abstract

This article contrasts legislator led and regulator led approaches to regulatory reform and contends that the determining factor for a jurisdiction in choosing an approach rests with the regulator. The article also argues that the approach taken, and the efficacy of the regulation, is dependent upon the proactivity of the regulator. The commitment of the regulator, whether it leads the development of anti-money laundering and counter terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regulation or not, will have a significant impact upon the success or failure of the reforms. The contrasting reactions of three jurisdictions to the money laundering and terrorism financing risks posed by the development of cryptocurrencies is explored. The benefits and drawbacks of regulator led and legislator led approaches to regulating cryptocurrency activity are appraised, contrasting the efficiency and efficacy, the stimuli for responding, and the common inadequacies in regulatory attempts thus far.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Cardiff Law & Politics
Publisher:	Sweet and Maxwell
ISSN:	0021-9460
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	1 May 2024
Date of Acceptance:	7 June 2023
Last Modified:	08 Nov 2024 02:30
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/168578

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item