Wheeler, Caleb H. ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The right to be present at trial is under threat following the decision of the Inter- national Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals’ Trial Chamber to continue proceedings against Félicien Kabuga after finding him mentally unfit to stand trial. The Trial Chamber opted instead to hold an ‘alternative finding procedure’, resembling a trial as closely as possible, albeit without the possibility of concluding with a verdict. This article engages with that decision through the lens of whether this approach com- plies with the accused’s right to be present at trial. It concludes that the proceedings will be little more than a de facto trial that does not adequately respect the accused’s right to be present. It also finds that should other international criminal courts and tri- bunals follow a similar approach the right to be present would be deprived of any real meaning. This could also, in turn, threaten overall fairness of the proceedings.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Law Cardiff Law & Politics |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KZ Law of Nations |
Publisher: | Brill Academic Publishers |
ISSN: | 1569-1853 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 19 July 2024 |
Date of Acceptance: | 6 May 2024 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2024 12:31 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/170602 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |