Effect of natural ventilation on aerosol transmission and infection risk in a minibus

Luo, Qiqi, Pan, Jiaying, Hang, Jian, Ma, Qihan, Ou, Cuiyun, Luo, Zhiwen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-3958 and Zeng, Liyue 2024. Effect of natural ventilation on aerosol transmission and infection risk in a minibus. Physics of Fluids 36 (11) , 115116. 10.1063/5.0236268 Item availability restricted.

PDF - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 4 November 2025 due to copyright restrictions. Download (10MB)

Abstract

High passenger density, prolonged exposure, and close interpersonal distance create a high infection risk (IR) in minibuses. While improving natural ventilation induced by turbulent airflows is essential for controlling IR in minibuses, comprehensive studies on its effectiveness are lacking. To address this, we conducted computational fluid dynamics simulations studies coupling indoor–outdoor turbulent airflows to examine the impact of window opening locations, window opening sizes, and initial droplet diameters (dp) on the ventilation airflow and dispersion of pathogen-laden droplets. Results show that the surrounding turbulent flow patterns create higher surface pressure at bus rear than bus front, which is a key factor influencing bus ventilation. When all windows are closed, ventilation is primarily provided by skylights at bus rooftops. Ventilation through only two skylights resulted in an air change rate per hour (ACH) of 17.55 h−1, leading to high IR of passengers. In contrast, fully opening front and rear windows increases ACH by 27.28-fold to 478.79 h−1, significantly reducing IR by 1–2 orders of magnitude compared to skylight ventilation. Expanding window opening sizes can effectively enhance ventilation when both front and rear windows open (attributed to the pumping effect), while is ineffective when only front windows open. To reduce IR in minibuses, we recommend opening multiple windows at the bus front and rear. Even if the total opening area of the front and rear windows is only two-thirds of that of the front window, its ACH is 2.8 times more than only opening front windows.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Architecture
Publisher:	American Institute of Physics
ISSN:	1070-6631
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	19 December 2024
Date of Acceptance:	11 October 2024
Last Modified:	19 Dec 2024 14:25
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/174020

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item