Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: Appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021–23

Gal, Micaela ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1326-190X, Cooper, Alison ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8660-6721, Joseph-Williams, Natalie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8944-2969, Doe, Elizabeth, Lewis, Ruth, Law, Rebecca Jane, Anstey, Sally ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-3761, Davies, Nathan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6104-9241, Walters, Amy, Orford, Robert, Collins, Brendan, Trigg, Lisa, Roberts, Chris, Meredith, Sarah, Macey, Steven, Carson-Stevens, Andrew, Greenwell, Jane, Coomber, Ffion and Edwards, Adrian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6228-4446 2024. Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: Appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021–23. PLoS ONE 19 (11) , e0314461. 10.1371/journal.pone.0314461

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB)

Abstract

Background: The Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was established from 2021–23 to ensure that the latest coronavirus (COVID-19) relevant research evidence was readily available to inform health and social care policy and practice decision-makers. Although decisions need to be evidence-based, ensuring that accessible and relevant research evidence is available to decision-makers is challenging, especially in a rapidly evolving pandemic environment when timeframes for decision-making are days or weeks rather than months or years. We set up knowledge mobilisation processes to bridge the gap between evidence review and informing decisions, making sure that the right information reaches the right people at the right time. Aims and objectives: To describe the knowledge mobilisation processes used by the WCEC, evaluate the impact of the WCEC rapid evidence reviews, and share lessons learned. Methods: Our knowledge mobilisation methods were flexible and tailored to meet stakeholders’ needs. They included stakeholder co-production in our rapid evidence review processes, stakeholder-informed and participatory knowledge mobilisation, wider dissemination of outputs and associated activities including public engagement, capacity building and sharing of methodologies. Feedback on processes and evidence of impact was collected via stakeholder engagement and a stakeholder survey. Results: Findings indicate that knowledge mobilisation processes successfully enabled use of the WCEC’s rapid evidence reviews to inform policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wales. Realising actual public and patient benefit from this ‘pathway to impact’ work will take further time and resources. Discussion and conclusion: The WCEC knowledge mobilisation processes successfully supported co-production and use of rapid evidence review findings by scientific advisors and policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified barriers and facilitators are of potential relevance to wider evidence initiatives, for setting up similar Centres during crisis situations, and supporting future evidence-based policy and practice decision-making.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine
Additional Information:	License information from Publisher: LICENSE 1: URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher:	Public Library of Science
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	27 November 2024
Date of Acceptance:	11 November 2024
Last Modified:	27 Nov 2024 10:15
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/174327

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item