Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Textual evidence systematic reviews series paper 3: critical appraisal of evidence from narrative, opinion, and policy

McArthur, Alexa, Cooper, Adam, Edwards, Deborah ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1885-9297, Klugarova, Jitka, Yan, Hu, Barber, Brittany V., Gregg, Emily E., Weeks, Lori E. and Jordan, Zoe 2025. Textual evidence systematic reviews series paper 3: critical appraisal of evidence from narrative, opinion, and policy. JBI Evidence Synthesis 25 (5) , pp. 833-839. 10.11124/jbies-24-00293
Item availability restricted.

[thumbnail of McArthur et al 2025_Textual evidence paper 3.pdf] PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 5 February 2026 due to copyright restrictions.

Download (228kB)

Abstract

JBI has long held the view that an inclusive approach to the conceptualization of what counts as evidence is important to the evidence-based movement. JBI’s approach for appraising textual evidence had encompassed all forms of text (narrative, opinion, and policy), with one general tool used to guide critical appraisal. The proliferation of textual evidence and increase in textual evidence reviews demonstrate the need to reconceptualize JBI’s methodological approach to critically appraising textual evidence. The objective of this paper is to outline the updated methodological approach to systematic reviews of textual evidence, especially in relation to the development of 3 separate critical appraisal tools for narrative, expert opinion, and policy text. Using an adapted Delphi approach, the JBI Textual Evidence Methodology Group convened over several rounds of meetings and discussions with international experts to reach consensus toward the reconceptualization of critical appraisal tools for textual evidence sources. Strategies to effectively interrogate the legitimacy and authenticity of sources were found to be dependent upon the type of textual evidence under review. Therefore, 3 separate critical appraisal tools for narrative, expert opinion, and policy text were developed. This paper provides an overview of the development of 3 separate critical appraisal tools, highlighting the complex nature of textual evidence data sources.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Schools > Healthcare Sciences
Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
ISSN: 2689-8381
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 12 May 2025
Date of Acceptance: 9 December 2024
Last Modified: 12 May 2025 11:15
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/176272

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Loading...

View more statistics