Death and denial in the city: Making sense of London Bridge and Grenfell

Thomas, Owen, Basham, Victoria M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8829-5119 and Crilley, Rhys 2025. Death and denial in the city: Making sense of London Bridge and Grenfell. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 10.1177/23996544251326476

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (619kB) | Preview

Abstract

In the wake of violent events comes a rush to make sense of what happened. Sensemaking matters because it bounds political possibilities, producing knowledge about what caused the violence, who is accountable, and whether society should change to prevent a recurrence. This paper explores sensemaking through an intertextual discourse analysis of elite, print, and social media responses to two violent events in the global city of London in June 2017: the London Bridge terrorist attack and the Grenfell Tower fire. For some, global cities like London are imagined as inclusive and post-imperial: a place of safety and security. Others regard global cities like London as sites of intensive racialisation, inequality, and hierarchy: a political order that produces insecurity. Scholarly debates suggest that public sensemaking could generate alternative political registers to contest the established narratives that sustain violent orders. Yet, our analysis reveals that, in this instance, intertextual sense-making in a social media age overwhelmingly reflected and reproduced existing socio-political order. Through discourses of denial, the prosperous global city of London emerged as a place where violence might occur but not a violent place. We analyse three discourses of denial: (1) that the events failed to reflect ‘who we are’, (2) that ‘others’ were to blame, and (3) a fatalistic acceptance that some violence ‘is what it is’. Despite academic optimism about public sensemaking, we show denial functions to externalise the causes of violence from socio-political and spatial orders, limiting the scope for change.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	In Press
Schools:	Schools > Department of Politics and International Relations (POLIR)
Subjects:	G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > G Geography (General) H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races J Political Science > JZ International relations
Publisher:	SAGE Publications
ISSN:	0263-774X
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	27 February 2025
Date of Acceptance:	20 February 2025
Last Modified:	26 Mar 2025 16:00
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/176462

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item