Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Inverted list-strength effects in recognition

Caplan, Jeremy B. and Guitard, Dominic 2025. Inverted list-strength effects in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

[thumbnail of Guitard. Inverted list-strength effects.pdf] PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (2MB)

Abstract

If some list items are studied strongly and others weakly, many memory models predict the effect of strength on memory will be larger when strengths are mixed within a list than between pure lists of a single strength: a list-strength effect. In explaining why list-strength effects were elusive in old/new recognition, Shiffrin et al. (1990) introduced differentiation. This gave the model a way to produce an inverted list-strength effect which they thought was usually offset by the co-existing expected “upright” list-strength effect. Alternatively, attentional subsetting theory (Caplan, 2023; Caplan & Guitard, 2024b) predicted inverted list-strength effects in some circumstances by considering how the dimensionalities of attended feature spaces might differ for strong and weak items. Inversions were indeed found in manipulations of stimulus duration (e.g., 500 ms versus 2000 ms study time/word). Here we replicated the pattern when display time was equated (Experiment 1) and with massed-repetition (Experiment 2), ruling out the relevance of visionlocked features and number of stimulus onsets. Both theoretical accounts of inverted list-strength effects, however, miss the fine structure of the data, namely, reduced hit rates for weak items in pure than mixed lists and the reverse effect (albeit less robust) for strong items. Model fits suggested the critical factor is that list composition parameterically influences the number of deep features processed at test combined with participants response bias adapting to list composition. In sum, inverted list-strength effects are robustly found in manipulations of item study time and point to differential processing of probe features depending on list composition, compatible with most models.

Item Type: Article
Status: In Press
Schools: Schools > Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association
ISSN: 0278-7393
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 18 March 2025
Date of Acceptance: 7 March 2025
Last Modified: 26 Mar 2025 12:45
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/176967

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics