Does the use of intravenous immunoglobulin improve clinical outcomes in adults with autoimmune encephalitis? A systematic review

Kalra, Anahat, Mackay, Olivia, Thomas‐Jones, Emma ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7716-2786, Solomon, Tom and Foscarini‐Craggs, Paula 2025. Does the use of intravenous immunoglobulin improve clinical outcomes in adults with autoimmune encephalitis? A systematic review. Brain and Behavior 15 (5) , e70491. 10.1002/brb3.70491

PDF - Published Version Download (854kB)

Abstract

Background: Autoimmune encephalitis is an immune‐mediated inflammatory condition affecting the central nervous system. Current best‐practice guidelines recommend intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for use if corticosteroids are ineffective, but the evidence surrounding the efficacy of IVIG in autoimmune encephalitis is yet to be evaluated. Objectives: Perform a systematic review of the available literature to evaluate the efficacy of IVIG in autoimmune encephalitis and the impact of IVIG on clinical outcomes. Methods: This systematic review was written following PRISMA‐S guidelines. Papers eligible for inclusion were primary research including adults aged 16 years and above, with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis, treated using IVIG. Each included study was assessed for quality. Results and conclusion: From 2533 records, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. The use of IVIG is associated with improved short‐term and long‐term neurological outcomes. There is evidence that IVIG may be more effective when used in combination with corticosteroids. The use of IVIG is significantly associated with reduced seizure incidence in patients. Where recorded, adverse effects related to IVIG were few. There is insufficient data available on how IVIG impacts mortality rates, discharge rates, and its effects according to different types of autoimmune encephalitis. Out of the included papers, there was 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 3 nonrandomized trials and 23 cohort studies. 25 of 27 papers were deemed to have a high or serious risk of bias. Heterogeneous study design and the quality of studies were major limiting factors for this review, highlighting the need for further research.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Schools > Medicine
Additional Information:	License information from Publisher: LICENSE 1: URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher:	Wiley
ISSN:	2162-3279
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	19 May 2025
Date of Acceptance:	31 March 2025
Last Modified:	19 May 2025 16:00
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/178352

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item