Visualising care: representing decision models for conservation

Henderson, Jane ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3027-8452 and Lingle, Ashley 2025. Visualising care: representing decision models for conservation. Journal of the Institute of Conservation 10.1080/19455224.2025.2551185 Item availability restricted.

	PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (386kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Provisional file) - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (17kB)

Abstract

This paper critically examines the visual models that represent conservation decision-making, arguing for a shift from linear, exclusionary frameworks toward inclusive, reflexive, and systems-based approaches. Traditional models, such as decision-trees, flow-diagrams, and scoring matrices, offer structure and clarity, particularly for novice practitioners. However, they often oversimplify complex realities, prioritising measurable outcomes and technical certainty over subjective, emotional, and ethical dimensions. These models risk narrowing our perspectives on care by marginalising stakeholders, reinforcing hierarchies, and excluding diverse perspectives, particularly in sensitive or contested heritage contexts. We use case studies and examples including the Hillsborough disaster archive to discuss how prioritising material preservation over access and social responsibility can result in profound failures of care. In such cases, the conservator’s role must shift from control to facilitation, recognising that true care may lie in enabling others’ engagement with heritage. To address the limitations of the dominant visual models for conservation decision-making, the paper proposes a systems-thinking approach that embraces complexity, interconnectedness, and change. The care that conservators offer is reframed as a dynamic, co-evolving practice shaped by relationships across time, space, and disciplines. A double-helix model is offered that visualises this interplay, integrating material and socio-cultural dimensions of care. This model supports adaptive, feedback-informed decision-making that aligns technical actions with cultural meaning and long-term sustainability. Our care should value plural perspectives, embrace uncertainty, and reposition conservation as an enabling, collaborative practice. By reimagining how care decisions are described we can better reflect the lived realities of heritage and the communities it serves.

Item Type:	Article
Status:	In Press
Schools:	Schools > History, Archaeology and Religion
Subjects:	A General Works > AM Museums (General). Collectors and collecting (General)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	conservation, decision-making, Systems-Thinking, exclusion, reflexivity, visual models, ethics
Publisher:	Taylor and Francis Group
ISSN:	1945-5224
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	4 September 2025
Date of Acceptance:	20 August 2025
Last Modified:	04 Sep 2025 13:22
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/180609

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item