Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Mendelian randomization studies of myopia: choosing the right summary statistics

Nguyen, Thu Nga, Terry, Louise ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-8230 and Guggenheim, Jeremy A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5164-340X 2025. Mendelian randomization studies of myopia: choosing the right summary statistics. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 66 (13) , 57. 10.1167/iovs.66.13.57

[thumbnail of Nguyen IOVS 2025.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose: To examine whether the choice of genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics can yield invalid or misleading conclusions in Mendelian randomization (MR) studies of myopia. Methods: The relationships between (1) years of full-time education and myopia, and (2) myopia and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), were used as exemplar test cases. MR analyses were performed with nine different sets of summary statistics for myopia: seven from sources widely used in published MR studies, plus two newly derived sets (a GWAS for myopia in either 66,773 unrelated participants or 93,036 participants that included relatives). Results: Using the two newly derived sets of summary statistics from GWAS for myopia in unrelated and related samples, MR analyses demonstrated a positive causal relationship between education and myopia: odds ratio (OR) for myopia = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.10 to 1.26 and OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.23 per additional year of education, respectively, and a positive relationship between myopia and POAG: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.19 and OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.21, respectively. MR analyses performed using existing published GWAS summary statistics yielded inconsistent results, including MR estimates that suggested education protected against myopia and that myopia reduced the risk of POAG. Re-analysis of a selection of published MR studies of myopia confirmed that most published results were invalid. Conclusions: Care is required when designing MR analyses. Many published MR studies of myopia have reported misleading results.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Schools > Optometry and Vision Sciences
Publisher: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1552-5783
Funders: UKRI EP/Y032292/1
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 31 October 2025
Date of Acceptance: 14 October 2025
Last Modified: 04 Nov 2025 15:30
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/182033

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics