Lewis, Richard Kurt ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (689kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article highlights two contrasting images of tort. The first reflects the traditional portrayal of justice, depicting tort as an independent `natural' system of rules of universal application forming the foundation of a just society. The second is more recent and relates to the perceived development of a damaging compensation culture. Focusing on personal injury litigation, we show how these portrayals differ from the reality of tort. In practice it is heavily influenced by institutional arrangements: the importance of both welfare provision and liability insurance is highlighted, and the effects of a `no-win no-fee' claims market are examined. The operation of tort is very much affected by commercial interests and the economic demands of the institutions which surround it. Overall we conclude that the images of tort fail to reflect how the personal injury compensation system actually operates.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Law |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KD England and Wales |
Publisher: | Blackwell Publishing |
ISSN: | 0263-323X |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 8 February 2022 |
Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2023 20:50 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/38244 |
Citation Data
Cited 25 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |