Waddington, Keir ![]() |
Abstract
Victorian commentators believed that London's hospitals were the greatest achievement of voluntarism. In an ‘age of charitable societies’ they were the most visible of Victorian manifestations of institutional philanthropy, providing an administrative and medical model that was copied throughout England and Wales. But what type of voluntarism did they represent? By examining the common motives for giving, the rights offered to donors in return for their generosity, and who managed London's hospitals in the period 1850 to 1900, the article explores the nature of voluntarism when it was mediated through a charitable institution. In doing so, it suggests that despite the inclusive fundraising rhetoric employed, the dominant role of the giver was tempered by the practicalities of management and by a form of voluntarism that claimed to be inclusive but was in fact exclusive. A study of hospitals in London suggests that Morris' concept of a ‘subscriber democracy’ needs to be refined to take account of growing pressure from women and the working classes to be involved in how the late Victorian hospital was managed in the second half of the nineteenth century. By looking at the role of women and working men in hospital management it raises questions about the unifying influence of institutional voluntarism and associational philanthropy.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | History, Archaeology and Religion |
Subjects: | D History General and Old World > DA Great Britain R Medicine > R Medicine (General) |
Publisher: | OUP |
ISSN: | 0013-8266 |
Last Modified: | 17 Oct 2022 09:37 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/3922 |
Citation Data
Cited 10 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |