O'Doherty, Damian and Willmott, Hugh ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1321-7041 2001. Debating Labour Process Theory: The Issue of Subjectivity and the Relevance of Poststructuralism. Sociology 35 (2) , pp. 457-476. 10.1177/S0038038501000220 |
Abstract
This paper locates labour process theory in broader sociological debates concerned with the action-structure dualism before examining three broad programmes for research that have emerged in response to the question of subjectivity and agency. Whereas the `orthodox' school tends to re-assert the structuralist and economistic features of Marx, the `anti-realist' or deconstructionist position invites the abandonment of analysis that has traditionally been orientated by the polarities of `structure' and `agency'. We identify and develop a third, `hybrid position', one that is informed by poststructuralist insights but does not neglect or reject established traditions of `modern' sociology and labour process research. Critical examinations of two recent studies of `subjectivity and the labour process' - Mike Sosteric's (1996) case study of a night club and Douglas Ezzy's (1997) paper on `good work' - are undertaken to show how poststructuralist insights may offer an instructive way of understanding how subjectivity is co-implicated in the accomplishment and reproduction of capitalist employment relations.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Subjects: | A General Works > AZ History of Scholarship The Humanities H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management H Social Sciences > HM Sociology |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Capitalism; labour process; poststructuralism; praxis; resistance; subjectivity |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
ISSN: | 0038-0385 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2022 10:09 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/39247 |
Citation Data
Cited 115 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |