Hedgecoe, Adam ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8965-3889 2012. Trust and regulatory organisations: The role of local knowledge and facework in research ethics review. Social Studies of Science 42 (5) , pp. 662-683. 10.1177/0306312712446364 |
Preview |
PDF (Postprint version)
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (352kB) | Preview |
Abstract
While trust is seen as central to most social relations, most writers, including sociologists of science, assume that modern trust relations – especially those in regulatory relationships – tend towards the impersonal. Drawing on ethnographic material from one kind of scientific oversight body – research ethics committees based in the UK NHS – this paper argues that interpersonal trust is crucial to regulatory decision-making and intimately bound up with the way in which these oversight bodies work, and that as such they build on, rather than challenge, the trust-based nature of the scientific community.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics (CESAGen) Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | ethics review; ethnography; regulation; research ethics committee (REC); trust |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
ISSN: | 0306-3127 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Last Modified: | 03 May 2023 12:44 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/40740 |
Citation Data
Cited 49 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |