Williams, Emma Joanne, Bott, Lewis ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-1231, Patrick, John and Lewis, Michael Bevan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-5318 2013. Telling lies: the irrepressible truth? Plos One 8 (4) , e60713. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060713 |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (515kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Telling a lie takes longer than telling the truth but precisely why remains uncertain. We investigated two processes suggested to increase response times, namely the decision to lie and the construction of a lie response. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were directed or chose whether to lie or tell the truth. A colored square was presented and participants had to name either the true color of the square or lie about it by claiming it was a different color. In both experiments we found that there was a greater difference between lying and telling the truth when participants were directed to lie compared to when they chose to lie. In Experiments 3 and 4, we compared response times when participants had only one possible lie option to a choice of two or three possible options. There was a greater lying latency effect when questions involved more than one possible lie response. Experiment 5 examined response choice mechanisms through the manipulation of lie plausibility. Overall, results demonstrate several distinct mechanisms that contribute to additional processing requirements when individuals tell a lie.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Psychology |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Publisher: | Public Library of Science |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Last Modified: | 05 May 2023 19:22 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/45996 |
Citation Data
Cited 15 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |