Martin, Stephen James ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Submitted Pre-Print Version
Download (116kB) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2013.799816
Abstract
Contrasting approaches to assessing the performance of public services highlight important issues for policy-makers and future research. We need systematic comparisons between countries. We should use a broader range of evidence. The public ought to have a greater role in designing performance criteria, and we need to know more about the impacts of assessments.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management J Political Science > JS Local government Municipal government |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Audit, local government, performance assessment, policy transfer |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
ISSN: | 0954-0962 |
Last Modified: | 10 Apr 2024 07:04 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/50000 |
Citation Data
Cited 18 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |