Grand, Christopher and Honey, Robert Colin ![]() |
Abstract
hree experiments examined the way in which exclusive-or (XOR) problems are solved by rats. All rats first received food-rewarded positive and negative patterning problems with two stimulus sets: either A+, B+, AB- and C-, D-, CD+, or A-, B-, AB + and C+, D +, and CD-. Subsequently, rats received revaluation trials in which A was paired with shock and C was not, prior to generalization test trials with B, D, AB, and CD (Experiments 1 & 2); or received A→shock trials prior to tests with B and CD (Experiment 3). There was greater generalized fear to B than to either D (Experiments 1 & 2) or AB (Experiment 2) and CD (Experiments 2 & 3). These results are inconsistent with configural, connectionist models, but are consistent with an alternative connectionist model that can represent the logical structure of XOR problems.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Psychology |
Additional Information: | Correction Notice: An erratum for this article was reported in Vol 35(1) of Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes (see record 2009-00257-012). Figure 2 in the article was printed incorrectly due to an editing error. |
Publisher: | American Psychological Association |
ISSN: | 0097-7403 |
Last Modified: | 17 Oct 2022 09:47 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/5589 |
Citation Data
Cited 17 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |