Cable, John, Henley, Andrew and Holland, Kevin ![]() |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2002.tb00068...
Abstract
Commentators have suggested that the winning companies in the UK 3G mobile telephone auction overpaid for their licences. However, event-study method using the market model under ordinary least squares (OLS), robust and structural time-series estimation yields no systematic evidence of the ‘winner's curse’. Positive as well as negative one-day wealth effects are observed amongst both winners and losers, and there is no lasting adverse market reaction to the winners, taken as a group. We conclude there is no case for easing the regulatory stance in the industry on grounds that the winners paid too much.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | winner's curse; 3G licence auction |
Publisher: | Wiley |
ISSN: | 0143-5671 |
Last Modified: | 25 Oct 2022 09:09 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/57502 |
Citation Data
Cited 9 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |