Honess, Terry M., Charman, E. A. and Levi, Michael ![]() |
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between recall of real-life pretrial publicity (PTP) in a high-profile fraud case and subsequent reasoning about the trial evidence and verdict decisions. Tracking the reasoning and verdict judgments of 50 mock jurors during a video simulation of the trial material, the effect of factual recall of PTP was compared with recall indicating an affective or evaluative response from the PTP. Affective/evaluative recall, but not factual recall, was significantly associated with anti-defendant reasoning and confidence in guilt. This effect was partially mediated by reasoning developed during the course of evidence presentation. The potentially prejudicial effect of affective/evaluative recall of PTP is discussed in terms of it activating an explanatory structure that frames evidence interpretation.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Cardiff Centre for Crime, Law and Justice (CCLJ) Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) K Law > K Law (General) |
Publisher: | Wiley Blackwell |
ISSN: | 0021-9029 |
Last Modified: | 25 Oct 2022 09:19 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/58072 |
Citation Data
Cited 19 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |