Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice

Bogacz, Rafal, Usher, Marius, Zhang, Jiaxiang ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4758-0394 and McClelland, James L. 2011. Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice. Seth, Anil K., Prescott, Tony J. and Bryson, Joanna J., eds. Modeling Natural Action Selection, Cambridge University Press, pp. 91-119. (10.1017/CBO9780511731525.009)

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The Leaky Competing Accumulator (LCA) is a biologically inspired model of choice. It describes the processes of leaky accumulation and competition observed in neuronal populations during choice tasks and it accounts for reaction time distributions observed in psychophysical experiments. This chapter discusses recent analyses and extensions of the LCA model. First, it reviews the dynamics and it examines the conditions that make the model achieve optimal performance. Second, it shows that nonlinearities of the type present in biological neurons improve performance when the number of choice-alternatives increases. Third, the model is extended to value-based choice, where it is shown that nonlinearities in the value function, explain risk-aversion in risky-choice and preference reversals in choice between alternatives characterised across multiple dimensions. Introduction Making choices on the basis of visual perceptions is an ubiquitous and central element of human and animal life, which has been studied extensively in experimental psychology. Within the last half century, mathematical models of choice reaction times have been proposed which assume that, during the choice process, noisy evidence supporting the alternatives is accumulated (Laming, 1968; Ratcliff, 1978; Stone, 1960; Vickers, 1970). Within the last decade, data from neurobiological experiments have shed further light on the neural bases of such choice. For example, it has been reported that while a monkey decides which of two stimuli is presented, certain neuronal populations gradually increase their firing rate, thereby accumulating evidence supporting the alternatives (Gold and Shadlen, 2002; Schall, 2001; Shadlen and Newsome, 2001). Recently, a series of neurocomputational models have offered an explanation of the neural mechanism underlying both, psychological measures like reaction times and neurophysiological data of choice. One such model, is the Leaky Competing Accumulator (LCA; Usher and McClelland, 2001), which is sufficiently simple to allow a detailed mathematical analysis. Furthermore, as we will discuss, this model can, for certain values of its parameters, approximate the same computations carried out by a series of mathematical models of choice (Busemeyer and Townsend, 1993; Ratcliff, 1978; Shadlen and Newsome, 2001; Vickers, 1970; Wang, 2002).

Item Type:	Book Section
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Publisher:	Cambridge University Press
ISBN:	9781107000490
Last Modified:	27 Oct 2022 10:10
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/69157

Citation Data

Cited 3 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item