Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families

Clarke, Angus John ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1200-9286, Richards, Martin, Kerzin-Storrar, Lauren, Halliday, Jane, Young, Mary Anne, Simpson, Sheila A., Featherstone, Katie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-8425, Forrest, Karen, Lucassen, Anneke, Morrison, Patrick J., Quarrel, Oliver W. J. and Stewart, Helen 2005. Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families. European Journal of Human Genetics 13 (5) , pp. 556-562. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201394

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Patients attending genetic clinics are often the main gatekeepers of information for other family members. There has been much debate about the circumstances under which professionals may have an obligation, or may be permitted, to pass on personal genetic information about their clients but without their consent to other family members. We report findings from the first prospective study investigating the frequency with which genetics professionals become concerned about the failure of clients to pass on such information to their relatives. In all, 12 UK and two Australian regional genetic services reported such cases over 12 months, including details of actions taken by professionals in response to the clients' failure to disclose information. A total of 65 cases of nondisclosure were reported, representing <1% of the genetic clinic consultations in the collaborating centres during the study period. These included 39 cases of the failure of parents not passing full information to their adult offspring, 22 cases where siblings or other relatives were not given information and four cases where information was withheld from partners – including former and prospective partners. Professionals reported clients' reasons for withholding information as complex, more often citing concern and the desire to shield relatives from distress rather than poor family relationships. In most cases, the professionals took further steps to persuade their clients to make a disclosure but in no instance did the professional force a disclosure without the client's consent.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education)
Subjects:	Q Science > QH Natural history > QH426 Genetics R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	confidentiality; disclosure; genetic information; genetic counselling
ISSN:	1018-4813
Last Modified:	17 Oct 2022 08:41
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/762

Citation Data

Cited 105 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item