Collins, Harold Maurice ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2909-9035 2008. Codes, signs and the explicit. [Working Paper]. School of Social Sciences Working Papers Series, vol. 101. Cardiff: Cardiff University. |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Download (234kB) | Preview |
Item Type: | Monograph (Working Paper) |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
Additional Information: | This is a working paper in the full sense of the word. It is a draft that may be completely misplaced and certainly invites the comments and corrections of anyone willing to read it. I am aware that there is a vast literature on semiotics that is not much referred to here (eg the terms `digital’ and `analogue’ as used here are roughly equivalent to Saussure’s `symbol’ and `icon’) and would welcome comments from those who know the corpus. But I am not so much interested in scholarly infelicities or, say, the political dimensions of interpretation, as any substantive mistakes I have made in terms of the aims of this paper and would be able to correct by going back to the literature, or any important ways in which I could push the argument forward that could be found there. The object of the paper is to sort out the claim made by Polanyi which appears in the second epigraph below. Please send comments to CollinsH@cf.acuk |
Publisher: | Cardiff University |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Last Modified: | 28 Oct 2022 10:24 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/78174 |
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |