Caminada, Martin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7498-0238 2006. On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4160 , pp. 111-123. 10.1007/11853886_11 |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11853886_11
Abstract
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation frameworks [1] led to the formalization of various argument-based semantics, which are actually particular forms of dealing with the issue of reinstatement. In this paper, we re-examine the issue of semantics from the perspective of postulates. In particular, we ask ourselves the question of which (minimal) requirements have to be fulfilled by any principle for handling reinstatement, and how this relates to Dung’s standard semantics. Our purpose is to shed new light on the ongoing discussion on which semantics is most appropriate.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Computer Science & Informatics |
Subjects: | Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
Publisher: | Springer Verlag |
ISSN: | 0302-9743 |
Last Modified: | 31 Oct 2022 10:17 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/84299 |
Citation Data
Cited 211 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |