No alternative to austerity: how BBC broadcast news reported the deficit debate

Berry, Mike ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4136-413X 2016. No alternative to austerity: how BBC broadcast news reported the deficit debate. Media, Culture and Society 38 (6) , pp. 844-863. 10.1177/0163443715620931

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (467kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article examines how BBC News at Ten covered the emergence of the UK public deficit debate in 2009. A total of 25 days of coverage drawn from the first seven months of 2009 were subject to a source and thematic content analysis to examine how news bulletins explained the emergence, consequences and possible solutions to the rise in the public deficit. Results indicated that political and financial elites dominated coverage. The consequence was that the news reproduced a very limited range of opinion on the implications and potential strategies for deficit reduction. The view that Britain was in danger of being abandoned by its international creditors with serious economic consequences was unchallenged and repeatedly endorsed by journalists. Despite their limited record of success during recessions, austerity policies dominated discussion of possible solutions to the rise in the deficit. This research thus raises questions about impartiality and the watchdog role of public service journalism.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Journalism, Media and Culture
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General) > PN1990 Broadcasting
Additional Information:	Published online before print February 9, 2016 Pdf uploaded in accordance with publisher's policy at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0163-4437/ (accessed 24/02/2016)
Publisher:	SAGE
ISSN:	0163-4437
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	30 March 2016
Date of Acceptance:	4 June 2015
Last Modified:	07 Nov 2023 07:03
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/87206

Citation Data

Cited 39 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item