Levi, Michael ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (776kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We suggest that when using the fraud triangle, academics and professionals should take account of the insights gleaned from our study, in which Switzerland and Austria's “elite” white-collar offenders with high professional standing and respectability were interviewed. Our perpetrators consider that only opportunity is a universal precondition of acts defined by others as fraud, though perceived pressure is salient to most frauds. By contrast, financial incentives are not required to be motivational elements. The frequently cited “rationalisation” is too simplistic: rather, a fraud-inhibiting inner voice before the crime and a guilty conscience after it were present among those interviewed.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HG Finance H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Fraud triangle; White-collar crime; Elite offender; Motivational trigger; Rationalisation |
Additional Information: | This journal has an embargo period of 36 months (from publisher's website. Accessed 29.04.16). |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
ISSN: | 0155-9982 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 29 April 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 30 December 2014 |
Last Modified: | 05 Dec 2024 22:45 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/88158 |
Citation Data
Cited 66 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |