Caminada, Martin ![]() |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_4
Abstract
We introduce an argument-based discussion game where the ability to win the game for a particular argument coincides with the argument being in the grounded extension. Our game differs from previous work in that (i) the number of moves is linear (instead of exponential) w.r.t. the strongly admissible set that the game is constructing, (ii) winning the game does not rely on cooperation from the other player (that is, the game is winning strategy based), (iii) a single game won by the proponent is sufficient to show grounded membership, and (iv) the game has a number of properties that make it more in line with natural discussion.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Computer Science & Informatics |
Publisher: | Springer |
ISBN: | 9783319284590 |
ISSN: | 0302-9743 |
Last Modified: | 01 Nov 2022 09:31 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/88275 |
Citation Data
Cited 3 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |