A dialectical approach for argument-based judgment aggregation

Caminada, Martin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7498-0238 and Booth, Richard ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6647-6381 2016. A dialectical approach for argument-based judgment aggregation. Presented at: 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2016), Potsdam, Germany, 13-16 September 2016. Published in: Baroni, Pietro, Gordon, Thomas F., Scheffler, Tatjana and Stede, Manfred eds. Computational Models of Argument. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications , vol.287 IOS Press, pp. 179-190. 10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-179

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (266kB) | Preview

Abstract

The current paper provides a dialectical interpretation of the argumentation-based judgment aggregation operators of Caminada and Pigozzi. In particular, we define discussion-based proof procedures for the foundational concepts of down-admissible and up-complete. We then show how these proof procedures can be used as the basis of dialectical proof procedures for the sceptical, credulous and super credulous judgment aggregation operators.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Computer Science & Informatics
Subjects:	Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Publisher:	IOS Press
ISBN:	9781614996859
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	15 June 2016
Date of Acceptance:	9 June 2016
Last Modified:	01 Nov 2022 10:31
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/91877

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item