Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Jonckheere-Terpstra test for nonclassical error versus log-sensitivity relationship of quantum spin network controllers

Jonckheere, Edmond, Schirmer, Sophie and Langbein, Frank ORCID: 2018. Jonckheere-Terpstra test for nonclassical error versus log-sensitivity relationship of quantum spin network controllers. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 28 (6) , pp. 2383-2403. 10.1002/rnc.4022

[thumbnail of Jonckheere_Terpstra.pdf]
PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (880kB) | Preview


Selective information transfer in spin ring networks by energy landscape shaping control has the property that the error 1-prob, where prob is the transfer success probability, and the sensitivity of the error to spin coupling uncertainties are statistically increasing across a family of controllers of increasing error. The need for a statistical Hypothesis Testing of a concordant trend is made necessary by the noisy behavior of the sensitivity versus the error as a consequence of the optimization of the controllers in a challenging error landscape. Here, we examine the concordant trend between the error and another measure of performance—the logarithmic sensitivity—used in robust control to formulate a well known fundamental limitation. Contrary to error versus sensitivity, the error versus logarithmic sensitivity trend is less obvious, because of the amplification of the noise due to the logarithmic normalization. This results in the Kendall τ test for rank correlation between the error and the log sensitivity to be somewhat pessimistic with marginal significance level. Here it is shown that the Jonckheere-Terpstra test, because it tests the Alternative Hypothesis of an ordering of the medians of some groups of log sensitivity data, alleviates this statistical problem. This identifies cases of concordant trend between the error and the logarithmic sensitivity, a highly anti-classical features that goes against the well know sensitivity versus complementary sensitivity limitation.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Computer Science & Informatics
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN: 1049-8923
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 24 November 2017
Date of Acceptance: 21 November 2017
Last Modified: 12 Nov 2023 11:03

Citation Data

Cited 9 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics