Johnson, Phillip ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7316-0732 2018. ‘So precisely what will you use your trade mark for?’ Bad faith and clarity in trade mark specifications. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 49 (8) , pp. 940-970. 10.1007/s40319-018-0747-6 |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (637kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The requirements for the specification setting out the list of goods and services covered by a trade mark registration are rarely considered in the literature or by the courts. The reference in C-371/18 Sky v Skykick will enable to Court of Justice to consider two critical issues connected with the precision of the specification: whether clarity of the specification is a substantive requirement and whether it is necessary to intend to use the mark on the date of filing. It is argued here that the Court of Justice should find that clarity is a substantive requirement for the registration of a trade mark and confirm that a lack of intention to use a mark is a type of bad faith which can lead to (partial) revocation of the trade mark.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Cardiff Law & Politics Law |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Additional Information: | This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
Publisher: | Springer |
ISSN: | 0018-9855 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 6 August 2018 |
Date of Acceptance: | 31 July 2018 |
Last Modified: | 04 May 2023 15:24 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/113818 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |