Perceptions of randomness: Why three heads are better than four

Hahn, Ulrike and Warren, Paul Antony 2009. Perceptions of randomness: Why three heads are better than four. Psychological Review 116 (2) , pp. 454-461. 10.1037/a0015241

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

A long tradition of psychological research has lamented the systematic errors and biases in people’s perception of the characteristics of sequences generated by a random mechanism such as a coin toss. It is proposed that once the likely nature of people’s actual experience of such processes is taken into account, these “errors” and “biases” actually emerge as apt reflections of the probabilistic characteristics of sequences of random events. Specifically, seeming biases reflect the subjective experience of a finite data stream for an agent with a limited short-term memory capacity. Consequently, these biases seem testimony not to the limitations of people’s intuitive statistics but rather to the extent to which the human cognitive system is finely attuned to the statistics of the environment.

Item Type:	Article
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Uncontrolled Keywords:	randomness ; intuitive statistics ; representativeness ; gambler’s fallacy ; probability.
Publisher:	American Psychological Association
ISSN:	0033-295X
Last Modified:	04 Mar 2018 21:24
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/11533

Citation Data

Cited 101 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item